首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health medicine >Private patients in NHS hospitals: comparison of two sources of information.
【24h】

Private patients in NHS hospitals: comparison of two sources of information.

机译:NHS医院的私人患者:两种信息来源的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The use of National Health Service (NHS) hospitals to treat private patients is debatable on the grounds of equity of access. Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) annual reports are the only routine source of information on the scale of this activity. The accuracy of the information is doubted. This enquiry tested the completeness of HES data against information obtained directly from private patient unit managers. METHOD: Managers of the 71 pay bed units in NHS hospitals in England were asked to supply from local registers and accounts the numbers of in-patients and day cases admitted in 1995-1996. Their reports were matched with the numbers of first consultant episodes for private in-patients and day cases shown for those hospitals in the HES data file for that year. RESULTS: Of the 71 units 62 responded; 53 of these gave usable data. The 53 included, and 18 excluded from the comparison, matched on median and range of bed numbers. Managers identified 16 per cent more total admissions than did HES, 62,572 against 54,131; 13 per cent more in-patient admissions, 39,776 against 35,319; and 21 per cent more day cases, 22,796 against 18,812. More total admissions were reported by managers of 38 pay bed units than were recorded in HES, fewer by 12, and equal numbers by three. Similar sized discrepancies were noted for in-patient admissions and day cases. Reasons for the under-reporting of private patients in HES included the use of separate patient administration systems for private patients with a failure to feed data to HES, and the omission of some provider units altogether by a minority of trusts from the returns made to the Department of Health. CONCLUSION: Overall, HES underestimates the amount of private patient activity reported directly by NHS hospitals. No method of validating private patient data is currently available. An amendment to an existing statistical return would provide a check on numbers. Central guidance on the inclusion of private patient activity in data transmitted by providers to the HES processing agency should be reinforced.
机译:背景:基于获得公平的理由,使用国家卫生局(NHS)医院治疗私人患者是有争议的。医院发作统计(HES)年度报告是此活动规模的唯一常规信息来源。信息的准确性令人怀疑。该查询根据直接从私人患者部门经理那里获得的信息测试了HES数据的完整性。方法:要求英格兰NHS医院的71个付费病床的管理人员从当地登记处提供药品,并核算1995-1996年住院病人和日间病例的数量。他们的报告与当年HES数据文件中针对私人住院患者的首批咨询病例数和这些医院的日间病例数相匹配。结果:在71个单位中,有62个作出了回应。其中53个提供了可用数据。包括53个床位,比较中排除的18个床位床位数和范围相匹配。管理人员确定的总入学人数比HES(62,572人,占54,131人)多16%;住院病人增加了13%,从35,319上升到39,776;日托案件增加了21%,从18,812起增加到22,796起。 38个付费病床单位的管理者报告的总入学人数比HES中记录的要多,减少了12个,相等的数量增加了3个。住院病人和日间病例的大小差异相似。 HES私人患者报告不足的原因包括:对无法向HES馈送数据的私人患者使用单独的患者管理系统,以及少数信托机构完全不愿为某些患者提供某些医疗服务。健康部门。结论:总体而言,HES低估了NHS医院直接报告的私人患者活动量。当前没有验证私人患者数据的方法。对现有统计报表的修订将对数字进行检查。应该加强关于将私人患者活动包括在提供商提供给HES处理机构的数据中的中央指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号