...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health >Community views on health sector reform and their participation in health priority setting: case of Lushoto and Muheza districts, Tanzania.
【24h】

Community views on health sector reform and their participation in health priority setting: case of Lushoto and Muheza districts, Tanzania.

机译:社区对卫生部门改革及其参与卫生优先重点设定的看法:坦桑尼亚卢肖托和穆赫扎地区的案例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Community participation (CP) is a key concept under 'primary health care' programmes and 'Health Sector Reform' (HSR) in many countries. However, international literature with current empirical evidence on CP in health priority setting and HSR in Tanzania is scanty. OBJECTIVES: To explore and describe community views on HSR and their participation in setting health priorities. METHODS: A multistage sampling of wards and villages was done, involving group discussions with members of households, Village Development Committees (VDCs) and Ward Development Committees (WDCs). RESULTS: Respondents at village and ward levels in both districts related HSR with a cost sharing system at public health facilities. Views on the advantages or disadvantages of HSR were mixed, most of the residents pointing out that user charges burden the poor, there is a shortage of drugs at peripheral health facilities, the performance of government health service staff and village health workers does not satisfy community needs, health insurance is promoted more than people actually benefit, VDC and WDC poorly function as compared to local community-participatory priority-setting structures. CONCLUSION: HSR may not meet the desired health needs unless more efforts are made to enhance the performance of the existing HSR structures and community knowledge and enhance trust and participation in the health sector programmes at all levels.
机译:背景:在许多国家,社区参与(CP)是“初级卫生保健”计划和“卫生部门改革”(HSR)下的关键概念。但是,在坦桑尼亚,卫生方面的优先重点确定和高铁方面,有关于CP的最新经验证据的国际文献很少。目的:探讨和描述社区对高铁及其在确定健康重点方面的看法。方法:对病房和村庄进行了多阶段抽样,涉及与家庭成员,村庄发展委员会(VDC)和病房发展委员会(WDC)进行小组讨论。结果:两个地区的村级和病房级受访者都将高铁与公共卫生设施的费用分摊系统联系起来。对于高铁的利弊看法不一,多数居民指出使用费负担重,周边医疗机构药品短缺,政府卫生服务人员和乡村卫生人员的表现不能令人满意。与当地社区参与式优先级确定结构相比,医疗保险的需求得到促进的程度超过了人们的实际利益,VDC和WDC的功能较差。结论:高铁可能无法满足期望的健康需求,除非做出更大的努力来提高现有高铁结构和社区知识的绩效,并增强对各级卫生部门计划的信任和参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号