...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health >Simulation modelling to validate the flow method for estimating completeness of case ascertainment by cancer registries.
【24h】

Simulation modelling to validate the flow method for estimating completeness of case ascertainment by cancer registries.

机译:仿真模型验证了用于估算癌症登记所确定病例的完整性的流程方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: To validate estimates of completeness of cancer ascertainment obtained by the flow method. METHODS: We generated a computer simulation of patient-level cancer registration processes, based loosely on the age distribution and survival of colorectal carcinoma patients, and utilizing a mixture of 'cured' and 'killed' subjects with an age-dependent fraction of 'cured' cases. The simulated data were then used in an analysis of completeness using the flow method. Validation of the simulation process was based on similarity of outputs to those obtained using real data, and validation of the flow method on its ability to correctly estimate the known proportion of cases in the simulated data which would never be registered. RESULTS: We successfully generated realistic data and have shown that completeness estimated by the flow method is close to the true value, whereas another method of estimating completeness (Ajiki's) was shown to be strongly biased. We also modelled what happens to completeness estimates when a new registry is set up. CONCLUSIONS: When its assumptions are met (steady state for incidence, survival and stable population structure), the flow method works well but is biased for cancers with good survival. Further research is required to assess the robustness of the method when these conditions are not met.
机译:背景:为了验证估计的流动性所获得的癌症确定性。方法:我们粗略地基于大肠癌患者的年龄分布和生存情况,并利用“治愈”和“杀死”受试者的混合物以及“年龄”与“年龄”相关的分数生成了计算机模拟的患者水平的癌症注册过程的情况。然后使用流法将模拟数据用于完整性分析。模拟过程的验证基于输出与使用实际数据获得的输出的相似性,以及流方法基于其正确估计模拟数据中永远不会记录的案例中已知比例的能力的验证。结果:我们成功地生成了现实数据,并证明了采用流动法估算的完整性接近于真实值,而另一种估算完整性的方法(Ajiki法)则显示出强烈的偏差。我们还建立了新的注册表时,对完整性估计发生了什么建模。结论:当满足其假设(发病率,生存率和种群结构稳定的稳态)时,流动法效果很好,但对于生存期好的癌症有偏倚。当不满足这些条件时,需要进一步研究以评估该方法的鲁棒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号