首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychiatric practice. >Effectiveness of the information technology-aided program of relapse prevention in schizophrenia (ITAREPS): A randomized, controlled, double-blind study
【24h】

Effectiveness of the information technology-aided program of relapse prevention in schizophrenia (ITAREPS): A randomized, controlled, double-blind study

机译:信息技术辅助的精神分裂症预防计划(ITAREPS)的有效性:一项随机,对照,双盲研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Information Technology-Aided Program of Re lapse Prevention in Schizophrenia (ITAREPS). Methods. Relapse-prone outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomized to the active (n=75) or control group (n=71). In the active arm, according to the protocol, investigators were prompted to increase the antipsychotic dose upon occurrence of a pharmacological inter vention requiring event (PIRE) detected by ITAREPS. Results. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis found no between-group difference in the hospitalization-free survival rate at 12 months. However, the trial suffered from high non-adherence of investigators in the active group, with no antipsychotic dose increase in 61% of PIREs. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis showed a 11-fold increased risk of hospitalization in the absence of pharmacological intervention following a PIRE (hazard ratio [HR]=10.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-80.0; p=0.002). Therefore, a post-hoc as-treated analysis was performed, which demonstrated a nine-fold reduction in the risk of hospitalization in ITAREPS Algorithm-Adherers (IAAs, n=25) compared with the ITAREPS Non-interventional group (INIs, n=70; Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, HR=0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.28, p=0.009; number needed to treat [NNT]=4, 95% CI 3-10). A significant difference in favor of the IAA group was seen in the number of inpatient days (p<0.05) and costs (p<0.05). Conclusion. Future ITAREPS trials should target the underlying mechanisms that cause low investigator adherence to the program. Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT00712660 (Journal of Psychiatric Practice 2012;18:269-280)
机译:目的。评估信息技术辅助的精神分裂症预防复发计划(ITAREPS)的有效性。方法。将患有精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的易复发门诊患者随机分为活动组(n = 75)或对照组(n = 71)。根据协议,在主动臂中,研究人员被提示在发生由ITAREPS检测到的需要药物干预的事件(PIRE)时增加抗精神病药物的剂量。结果。意向治疗(ITT)分析发现12个月无住院生存率的组间无差异。但是,该试验遭受了活动组研究人员的高度不依从,在61%的PIRE中抗精神病药物剂量没有增加。此外,Cox回归分析显示,PIRE后在没有药理干预的情况下住院风险增加了11倍(危险比[HR] = 10.8; 95%置信区间[CI] 1.4-80.0; p = 0.002)。因此,进行了事后分析,与ITAREPS非干预组(INIs,n =)相比,ITAREPS Algorithm-Adherers(IAAs,n = 25)的住院风险降低了九倍。 70; Kaplan-Meier生存分析,HR = 0.11,95%CI 0.05-0.28,p = 0.009;治疗[NNT] = 4,95%CI 3-10。在住院天数(p <0.05)和费用(p <0.05)上,对IAA组的支持存在显着差异。结论。未来的ITAREPS试验应针对导致研究者对该计划依从性较低的潜在机制。试验注册:NCT00712660临床试验(Journal of Psychiatric Practice 2012; 18:269-280)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号