首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Effects of Long-Term Simulated RPD Clasp Attachment/Detachment on Retention Loss and Wear for Two Clasp Types and Three Abutment Material Surfaces
【24h】

Effects of Long-Term Simulated RPD Clasp Attachment/Detachment on Retention Loss and Wear for Two Clasp Types and Three Abutment Material Surfaces

机译:长期模拟RPD搭扣的附着/分离对两种搭扣类型和三种基台材料表面的固位力损失和磨损的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the loss of retention and wear of two clasp types (E-circlet, back action) against three abutment materials (enamel, composite, CAD/CAM ceramic) after 16,000 simulated cycles of attachment-detachment. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight models were constructed by placing either an upper first premolar or a metal die inside a metal rectangular block. Models were divided according to the abutment teeth into three groups. Group E consisted of 16 unrestored human premolars with sound enamel. Group R had 16 premolars recontoured buccally using composite resin. Group C had 16 metal dies (duplicated from a human premolar) covered by CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. On the models, E-circlet (E) and back-action (B) clasps were constructed to engage the model's teeth. Withdrawal and insertion cycling of clasps was carried out for 16,000 cycles by using a chewing simulator. The retention force of each clasp was measured after cycling. An acrylic replica was made for each abutment retention surface before and after cycling. Each replica was examined by SEM, and the wear areas were measured. The data were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: There was no significant retention loss after 16,000 cycles (p≥ 0.05) of both clasps (E, B) on the three abutment materials (E, R, C). The mean of wear areas in mm 2 were 1.83 ± 0.36, 0.85 ± 0.66, 2.37 ± 1.88, 1.7 ± 1.11, 0.6 ± 0.2, and 0.06 ± 0 for EE, BE, ER, BR, EC, and BC, respectively. There were significant differences among the wear areas of the abutment surface of the six subgroups (p≤ 0.05). Conclusion: The composite resin contoured surfaces showed more wear than the enamel and ceramic surfaces. E-clasps caused more wear on the abutment materials than back-action clasps.
机译:目的:这项体外研究的目的是在模拟16,000个模拟附着周期后,测量两种扣环类型(E型环,反作用)对三种基台材料(牙釉质,复合材料,CAD / CAM陶瓷)的保持力和磨损损失-分离。材料和方法:通过在金属矩形块内放置上部第一前磨牙或金属模具来构建48个模型。根据基牙将模型分为三组。 E组由16个未复原的人类前磨牙和搪瓷组成。 R组使用复合树脂在颊侧重塑16个前磨牙。 C组有16个金属模具(复制自人的前磨牙)被CAD / CAM全陶瓷冠覆盖。在模型上,构造了E型小环(E)和反作用(B)的扣环以啮合模型的牙齿。通过使用咀嚼模拟器,扣环的抽出和插入循环进行了16,000个循环。循环后测量每个扣的保持力。在循环之前和之后,为每个基台固位表面制作丙烯酸复制品。通过SEM检查每个复制品,并测量磨损区域。使用单向方差分析,双向方差分析和Mann-Whitney检验对数据进行统计分析。结果:在三种基台材料(E,R,C)上,两个扣环(E,B)经过16,000个循环(p≥0.05)后,没有明显的保持力损失。对于EE,BE,ER,BR,EC和BC,以mm 2为单位的平均磨损区域分别为1.83±0.36、0.85±0.66、2.37±1.88、1.7±1.11、0.6±0.2和0.06±0。六个亚组的基台表面磨损区域之间存在显着差异(p≤0.05)。结论:复合树脂轮廓表面比瓷釉和陶瓷表面显示出更多的磨损。电子扣环比靠背扣环对基台材料的磨损更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号