...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Cortical bone stress distribution in mandibles with different configurations restored with prefabricated bar-prosthesis protocol: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
【24h】

Cortical bone stress distribution in mandibles with different configurations restored with prefabricated bar-prosthesis protocol: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.

机译:预制棒假体方案恢复了具有不同配置的下颌骨中的皮质骨应力分布:三维有限元分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate stress distribution in different horizontal mandibular arch formats restored by protocol-type prostheses using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A representative model (M) of a completely edentulous mandible restored with a prefabricated bar using four interforaminal implants was created using SolidWorks 2010 software (Inovart, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and analyzed by Ansys Workbench 10.0 (Swanson Analysis Inc., Houston, PA) to obtain the stress fields. Three mandibular arch sizes were considered for analysis, regular (M), small (MS), and large (ML). Three unilateral posterior loads (L) (150 N) were used: perpendicular to the prefabricated bar (L1); 30 degrees oblique in a buccolingual direction (L2); 30 degrees oblique in a lingual-buccal direction (L3). The maximum and minimum principal stresses (sigma(max), sigma(min)), the equivalent von Mises (sigma(vM)), and the maximum principal strain (sigma(max) ) were obtained for type I (M.I) and type II (M.II) cortical bones. RESULTS: Tensile stress was more evident than compression stress in type I and II bone; however, type II bone showed lower stress values. The L2 condition showed highest values for all parameters (sigma(vM), sigma(max), sigma(min), varepsilon(max)). The sigma(vM) was highest for the large and small mandibular arches. CONCLUSION: The large arch model had a higher influence on sigma(max) values than did the other formats, mainly for type I bone. Vertical and buccolingual loads showed considerable influence on both sigma(max) and sigma(min) stresses.
机译:目的:使用三维有限元分析(3D-FEA)评估协议型假体恢复的不同水平下颌弓形应力分布。材料与方法:使用SolidWorks 2010软件(巴西圣保罗的Inovart)创建了使用四个椎间孔植入物并用预制棒修复的完全无牙颌的代表性模型(M),并通过Ansys Workbench 10.0(Swanson Analysis Inc.,宾夕法尼亚州的休斯顿)以获取应力场。考虑三种下颌弓尺寸进行分析,常规(M),小(MS)和大(ML)。使用了三个单侧后方载荷(L)(150 N):垂直于预制杆(L1);沿颊舌方向倾斜30度(L2);舌颊方向(L3)倾斜30度。对于类型I(MI)和类型,获得了最大和最小主应力(sigma(max),sigma(min)),等效冯·米塞斯(sigma(vM))和最大主应变(sigma(max))。 II(M.II)皮质骨。结果:I型和II型骨的拉伸应力比压缩应力更明显。但是,II型骨的应力值较低。 L2条件显示所有参数(sigma(vM),sigma(max),sigma(min)和varepsilon(max))的最大值。下颌大弓和小弓的sigma(vM)最高。结论:大牙弓模型对sigma(max)值的影响比其他格式大,主要是I型骨。竖向和颊侧载荷均对sigma(max)和sigma(min)应力均显示了相当大的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号