...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Effect of airborne-particle abrasion and mechanico-thermal cycling on the flexural strength of glass ceramic fused to gold or cobalt-chromium alloy.
【24h】

Effect of airborne-particle abrasion and mechanico-thermal cycling on the flexural strength of glass ceramic fused to gold or cobalt-chromium alloy.

机译:气载颗粒的磨损和机械热循环对与金或钴铬合金熔合的玻璃陶瓷抗弯强度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of airborne-particle abrasion and mechanico-thermal cycling on the flexural strength of a ceramic fused to cobalt-chromium alloy or gold alloy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Metallic bars (n = 120) were made (25 mm x 3 mm x 0.5 mm): 60 with gold alloy and 60 with Co-Cr. At the central area of the bars (8 mm x 3 mm), a layer of opaque ceramic and then two layers of glass ceramic (Vita VM13, Vita Zahnfabrick) were fired onto it (thickness: 1 mm). Ten specimens from each alloy group were randomly allocated to a surface treatment [(tungsten bur or air-particle abrasion (APA) with Al(2) O(3) at 10 mm or 20 mm away)] and mechanico-thermal cycling (no cycling or mechanically loaded 20,000 cycles; 10 N distilled water at 37 degrees C and then thermocycled 3000 cycles; 5 degrees C to 55 degrees C, dwell time 30 seconds) combination. Those specimens that did not undergo mechanico-thermal cycling were stored in water (37 degrees C) for 24 hours. Bond strength was measured using a three-point bend test, according to ISO 9693. After the flexural strength test, failure types were noted. The data were analyzed using three factor-ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha= 0.05). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the flexural bond strength of gold and Co-Cr groups (42.64 +/- 8.25 and 43.39 +/- 10.89 MPa, respectively). APA 10 and 20 mm away surface treatment (45.86 +/- 9.31 and 46.38 +/- 8.89 MPa, respectively) had similar mean flexural strength values, and both had significantly higher bond strength than tungsten bur treatment (36.81 +/- 7.60 MPa). Mechanico-thermal cycling decreased the mean flexural strength values significantly for all six alloy-surface treatment combinations tested when compared to the control groups. The failure type was adhesive in the metal/ceramic interface for specimens surface treated only with the tungsten bur, and mixed for specimens surface treated with APA 10 and 20 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the levels adopted in this study, the alloy did not affect the bond strength; APA with Al(2) O(3) at 10 and 20 mm improved the flexural bond strength between ceramics and alloys used, and the mechanico-thermal cycling of metal-ceramic specimens resulted in a decrease of bond strength.
机译:目的:评估气载颗粒的磨损和机械热循环对与钴铬合金或金合金熔合的陶瓷的弯曲强度的影响。材料与方法:制作金属棒(n = 120)(25 mm x 3 mm x 0.5 mm):60用金合金,60用Co-Cr。在棒的中心区域(8毫米x 3毫米)上,烧成一层不透明的陶瓷,然后烧成两层玻璃陶瓷(Vita VM13,Vita Zahnfabrick)(厚度:1 mm)。每个合金组的十个样本被随机分配到表面处理[(钨针或在10 mm或20 mm处有Al(2)O(3)的空气颗粒磨损(APA))]和机械热循环(无循环或机械加载20,000个循环;在37摄氏度下10 N蒸馏水,然后热循环3000循环; 5摄氏度至55摄氏度,保压时间30秒)组合。将那些没有进行机械热循环的样品在水中(37摄氏度)保存24小时。根据ISO 9693,使用三点弯曲试验测量粘结强度。抗弯强度试验后,记录破坏类型。使用三因素方差分析和Tukey检验(alpha = 0.05)分析数据。结果:金和钴铬合金的挠曲结合强度之间没有显着差异(分别为42.64 +/- 8.25和43.39 +/- 10.89 MPa)。 APA 10和20 mm距离表面处理(分别为45.86 +/- 9.31和46.38 +/- 8.89 MPa)具有相似的平均抗弯强度值,并且两者均具有比钨bur处理(36.81 +/- 7.60 MPa)明显更高的结合强度。与对照组相比,机械热循环显着降低了所测试的所有六个合金表面处理组合的平均抗弯强度值。失效类型为金属/陶瓷界面中仅用钨针进行表面处理的样品中的粘合剂,而对于经APA 10和20 mm表面处理的样品进行混合。结论:考虑到本研究中采用的水平,该合金不影响粘结强度。在10和20 mm处具有Al(2)O(3)的APA改善了所用陶瓷和合金之间的挠曲结合强度,金属陶瓷样品的机械热循环导致结合强度降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号