首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Clinical evaluation of a new resilient denture liner. Part 1: Compliance and color evaluation.
【24h】

Clinical evaluation of a new resilient denture liner. Part 1: Compliance and color evaluation.

机译:新型弹性义齿衬垫的临床评估。第1部分:合规性和颜色评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: A new experimental resilient denture liner (MPDS-SL; Lai Laboratories, Burnsville, MN) and Molloplast-B (Buffalo Dental Manufacturing, Syosset, NY) were clinically evaluated for compliance and color change over a 1-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this crossover study, each of 20 patients had 2 dentures fabricated with long-term, silicone-based resilient liners, 1 denture with Molloplast-B and the other with MPDS-SL. Each denture was used for 6 months, during which time each patient kept a journal detailing his or her use and cleaning regimen. The 2 materials were assessed for compliance and color at the beginning of the study and again after 3 months and 6 months of use. Compliance was determined by applying a 3-lb force to the surface of the material following a square-wave pattern, using a closed-loop servohydraulic testing system. The force and position values were recorded using a storage oscilloscope. Compliance was measured at 3 locations on each denture and analyzed using data-acquisition software. Images of the dentures were captured using a zoom stereomicroscope with a charge-coupled video camera and image analysis software. The color was measured at 3 locations on each denture; RGB and L* a* b* were calculated. RESULTS: Compliance increased from baseline to 3 months and from 3 months to 6 months for almost all locations on both materials. Molloplast-B and MPDS-SL differed in average change in compliance at 6 months; the average change in compliance from baseline to 6 months was 453 (standard error, 46) for Molloplast-B and 284 (standard error, 46) for MPDS-SL (p = 0.019). For both materials, color changed significantly from baseline to 3 months and from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.01). MPDS-SL changed significantly less than Molloplast-B from baseline to 6 months for R (p = 0.039), G (p = 0.037), B (p = 0.005), and L* (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: For both materials, compliance increased over 6 months of wear. The color change for MPDS-SL was considerably less significant than that for Molloplast-B.
机译:目的:在一年的时间内,对一种新的实验性弹性义齿衬垫(MPDS-SL; Lai Laboratories,明尼苏达州伯恩斯维尔)和Molloplast-B(布法罗牙科制造公司,纽约州Syosset)进行了顺应性和颜色变化的临床评估。材料与方法:在这项交叉研究中,20例患者中的每一个都有2个假牙,这些假牙是用硅树脂为基础的长期弹性衬里制成的,1个假牙是用Molloplast-B制成的,另一个是MPDS-SL。每个假牙使用了6个月,在此期间,每个患者保留一份日记,详细说明其使用和清洁方案。在研究开始时以及使用3个月和6个月后再次评估2种材料的顺应性和颜色。通过使用闭环伺服液压测试系统按照方波图样向材料表面施加3磅力来确定是否合格。使用存储示波器记录力和位置值。在每个义齿上的3个位置测量顺应性,并使用数据采集软件进行分析。使用带有电荷耦合摄像机和图像分析软件的变焦立体显微镜捕获义齿的图像。在每个义齿上的3个位置测量颜色。计算了RGB和L * a * b *。结果:两种材料的几乎所有位置的依从性从基线增加到3个月,从3个月增加到6个月。 Molloplast-B和MPDS-SL在6个月时的依从性平均变化有所不同;从基线到6个月时,Molloplast-B的依从性平均变化为453(标准误,46),而MPDS-SL为284(标准误,46)(p = 0.019)。对于这两种材料,颜色从基线到3个月以及从基线到6个月都发生了显着变化(p <0.01)。对于R(p = 0.039),G(p = 0.037),B(p = 0.005)和L *(p = 0.042),从基线到6个月,MPDS-SL的变化明显小于Molloplast-B。结论:对于这两种材料,在磨损6个月后,依从性均得到提高。 MPDS-SL的颜色变化明显少于Molloplast-B的颜色变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号