首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium.
【24h】

Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium.

机译:不同抛光剂和抛光剂对纯钛铸件表面粗糙度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of finishing and polishing agents on surface roughness of cast commercially pure titanium using scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Materials and Methods: A standardized square steel die measuring 10 x 10 mm with a thickness of 2 mm was machine cut. An impression of this die was used to create wax patterns for casting. Sixty specimens were cast in commercially pure titanium. These were divided into three groups (A, B, and C) of 20 specimens each. Group A specimens were polished with black, brown, and green rubber discs followed by green polishing compound with buff. Group B specimens were polished with black, brown, and green rubber cones, buffed with yellow polishing cake designed for gold alloy. Group C specimens were polished with silicium carbide cones and buffed with orange polishing cake. Surface roughness of the test specimens was measured in microns with a perthometer. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's honest significantdifference (HSD) multiple comparison tests among the different groups. Qualitative analysis was done by SEM photomicrographs. Results: Surface roughness values R(a) for Groups A, B, and C were 0.68 mum, 0.78 mum, and 0.27 mum, respectively. SEM photomicrographs and the statistical analysis revealed that the finishing and polishing were better with Group C test specimens with lower surface roughness values compared with groups A and B. Tests showed that Group C was statistically smoother (p< 0.01). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, surface roughness was less on cast CpTi specimens that were finished and polished from the cutters designed specifically for titanium. J Prosthodont 2007;16:263-268. Copyright (c) 2007 by The American College of Prosthodontists.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析评估抛光剂和抛光剂对市售纯钛铸件表面粗糙度的影响。材料和方法:将尺寸为10 x 10 mm,厚度为2 mm的标准方钢模具机切。该模具的印模用于制作用于铸造的蜡模。六十个标本用市售纯钛铸造而成。将它们分为三组(A,B和C),每组20个样品。 A组标本先用黑色,棕色和绿色橡胶圆盘打磨,再用带有抛光剂的绿色抛光剂打磨。 B组标本用黑色,棕色和绿色橡胶锥抛光,并用为金合金设计的黄色抛光饼抛光。 C组试样用碳化硅圆锥体抛光,并用橙色抛光饼抛光。用珀氏计测量试样的表面粗糙度,以微米为单位。使用方差分析和Tukey的诚实显着差异(HSD)多个组之间的多重比较测试分析数据。通过SEM显微照片进行定性分析。结果:A,B和C组的表面粗糙度值R(a)分别为0.68微米,0.78微米和0.27微米。 SEM照片和统计分析表明,与较低的表面粗糙度值相比,C组试样的精加工和抛光效果优于A组和B组。试验表明,C组在统计学上更平滑(p <0.01)。结论:在这项研究的局限性内,使用专门为钛设计的切割机精加工和抛光的铸造CpTi标本的表面粗糙度要小一些。 J Prosthodont 2007; 16:263-268。美国假牙专科学院(c)2007版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号