...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >A 4-year prospective study to assess peri-implant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns.
【24h】

A 4-year prospective study to assess peri-implant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns.

机译:一项为期4年的前瞻性研究,用于评估单个种植体冠中钛与金合金基台相邻的种植体周围软组织和硬组织。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to compare titanium and gold-alloy abutments when used with cemented, implant-supported single-tooth crowns. For 4 years following prosthodontic rehabilitation, these abutments were evaluated with respect to peri-implant marginal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissue parameters. Materials and Methods: During the years 1998 to 2000, 20 patients were selected from a patient population receiving treatment in the Implantology Department at the University of Padova, Italy. They all presented with single-tooth bilateral edentulous sites in the premolar/molar region with adequate bone width, similar bone height on each side, and an occlusal scheme that allowed for the establishment of identical occlusal cusp/fossa contacts on each side. Each subject received two identical implants (one in each edentulous site). One was randomly selected to be restored with a titanium abutment and a cemented implant-supported single-tooth crown, and the other was restored with a gold-alloy abutment and a cemented implant-supported single tooth crown. Data on peri-implant marginal bone levels and soft tissue parameters were collected for 4 years after abutment and crown insertion placement and analyzed to determine whether there was a significant (p< .001) difference with respect to the type of abutments (titanium vs. gold alloy) used. Results: All subjects completed the study. All 40 implants survived, resulting in a cumulative implant success rate of 100%. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the two groups with respect to peri-implant marginal bone levels and soft tissue parameters. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the results indicate that there was no evidence of different response with the peri-implant marginal bone and soft tissue when titanium or gold-alloy abutments were used in conjunction with the cemented, single-tooth implant restorations provided for this limited patient population. There was no evidence of different behavior of peri-implant marginal bone and of peri-implant soft tissue when titanium abutments or gold-alloy abutments were used for cemented single-tooth implant restorations in this limited patient population.
机译:目的:这项前瞻性临床研究的目的是比较钛合金和金合金基台与种植体支撑的单牙冠结合使用时的效果。修复修复后的4年中,对这些基台的种植体周围边缘骨水平和种植体周围软组织参数进行了评估。材料和方法:在1998年至2000年期间,从意大利帕多瓦大学的种植学系接受治疗的患者人群中选出20名患者。他们都在前磨牙/磨牙区域表现出单齿双侧无牙区,并具有足够的骨宽度,每侧相似的骨高,并且采用了一种咬合方案,允许在每一侧建立相同的咬合尖/窝接触。每个受试者接受两个相同的植入物(每个无牙部位一个)。随机选择其中一个用钛基台和骨水泥固定的单牙冠修复,另一个用金合金基台和骨水泥固定的单牙冠修复。在基台和牙冠插入放置后的4年中收集有关种植体周围边缘骨水平和软组织参数的数据,并进行分析以确定相对于基台类型(钛vs.钛合金)是否存在显着(p <.001)差异。金合金)。结果:所有受试者均完成了研究。所有40个植入物均存活,导致植入物累计成功率达100%。统计分析表明,两组之间在植入物周围边缘骨水平和软组织参数方面无显着差异。结论:在这项研究的局限性内,结果表明,当钛或金合金基台与骨水泥,单齿种植体修复体结合使用时,没有证据表明种植体周围的边缘骨和软组织有不同的反应。提供给此有限的患者群体。当将钛基台或金合金基台用于这种有限的患者人群中的骨水泥单齿种植体修复中时,没有证据表明种植体周围边缘骨和种植体周围软组织的行为不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号