...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physical therapy science. >Stretching Versus Mechanical Traction of the Spine in Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis
【24h】

Stretching Versus Mechanical Traction of the Spine in Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis

机译:脊柱拉伸与机械牵引治疗特发性脊柱侧弯

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Traction-based therapies are non-invasive and probably cost-effective and have received interest recently. This study was conducted to compare two training programs, traction and stretching exercises, in rehabilitation of moderate scoliotic patients. [Subjects] Forty patients who were 15 to 25 years of age and had moderate scoliosis (Cobb's angle of 20 to 40 degrees) were randomized to either a stretching exercises group (n=20) or mechanical traction group (n=20). [Methods] All the patients were informed about the testing and training procedure and were allocated randomly into two groups. Both the groups received a common physical therapy program of 3 sessions a week for 3 months. In addition, the stretching exercises group received stretching of muscles on the concave side with postural instructions for activities of daily living. The mechanical traction group received mechanical traction of the lumbar spine with postural instructions for activities of daily living. The outcome measures used were anteroposterior view of loading X-ray to detect any change in the Cobb's angle of the lower spine, tape measurement to detect forward flexion of the trunk by using fingertip-to-floor test (FFT), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain measurement. [Results] There was more significant improvement of the Cobb's angle in the stretching exercises group than in the mechanical traction group. There was no significant difference in VAS and FFT values between the groups. [Conclusion] Stretching exercises led to significant improvement in the Cobb's angle and resulted in improvement of scoliotic curves in moderate scoliotic patients. ^g>Stretching exercises, Idiopathic scoliosis, Spinal deformity
机译:基于牵引的疗法是非侵入性的并且可能具有成本效益,并且最近受到关注。这项研究的目的是比较中度脊柱侧弯患者的康复训练中的两种训练方案,即牵引和伸展运动。 [对象] 40名年龄在15至25岁之间的中度脊柱侧弯(科布角为20至40度)的患者被随机分为伸展运动组(n = 20)或机械牵引组(n = 20)。方法对所有患者进行测试和培训,并随机分为两组。两组均接受了为期3个月,每周3次的普通物理治疗计划。此外,伸展运动小组接受了在凹面一侧的肌肉伸展运动,并通过姿势指导进行了日常生活活动。机械牵引组对腰椎进行机械牵引,并附有姿势指导,以进行日常生活活动。所采用的结果测量方法是:在X射线的前后视图上观察下脊柱的Cobb角的任何变化,通过指尖至地板的测试(FFT)进行卷尺测量以检测躯干的前屈,以及使用视觉模拟用于疼痛测量的量表(VAS)。 [结果]伸展运动组的Cobb角改善比机械牵引组更显着。两组之间的VAS和FFT值没有显着差异。 [结论]伸展运动导致中度脊柱侧弯患者的Cobb角明显改善,并改善了脊柱侧弯曲线。 ^ g>伸展运动,特发性脊柱侧弯,脊柱畸形

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号