首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics >Drug-drug interaction predictions with PBPK models and optimal multiresponse sampling time designs: application to midazolam and a phase I compound. Part 1: comparison of uniresponse and multiresponse designs using PopDes.
【24h】

Drug-drug interaction predictions with PBPK models and optimal multiresponse sampling time designs: application to midazolam and a phase I compound. Part 1: comparison of uniresponse and multiresponse designs using PopDes.

机译:PBPK模型和最佳多反应采样时间设计的药物相互作用预测:在咪达唑仑和I相化合物中的应用。第1部分:使用PopDes比较无响应和多响应设计。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal sampling time design of a drug-drug interaction (DDI) study for the estimation of apparent clearances (CL/F) of two co-administered drugs (SX, a phase I compound, potentially a CYP3A4 inhibitor, and MDZ, a reference CYP3A4 substrate) without any in vivo data using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) predictions, population PK modelling and multiresponse optimal design. METHODS: PBPK models were developed with AcslXtreme using only in vitro data to simulate PK profiles of both drugs when they were co-administered. Then, using simulated data, population PK models were developed with NONMEM and optimal sampling times were determined by optimizing the determinant of the population Fisher information matrix with PopDes using either two uniresponse designs (UD) or a multiresponse design (MD) with joint sampling times for both drugs. Finally, the D-optimal sampling time designs were evaluated by simulation and re-estimation with NONMEM by computing the relative root mean squared error (RMSE) and empirical relative standard errors (RSE) of CL/F. RESULTS: There were four and five optimal sampling times (=nine different sampling times) in the UDs for SX and MDZ, respectively, whereas there were only five sampling times in the MD. Whatever design and compound, CL/F was well estimated (RSE < 20% for MDZ and <25% for SX) and expected RSEs from PopDes were in the same range as empirical RSEs. Moreover, there was no bias in CL/F estimation. Since MD required only five sampling times compared to the two UDs, D-optimal sampling times of the MD were included into a full empirical design for the proposed clinical trial. A joint paper compares the designs with real data. CONCLUSION: This global approach including PBPK simulations, population PK modelling and multiresponse optimal design allowed, without any in vivo data, the design of a clinical trial, using sparse sampling, capable of estimating CL/F of the CYP3A4 substrate and potential inhibitor when co-administered together.
机译:目的:确定药物-药物相互作用(DDI)研究的最佳采样时间设计,以估计两种共同给药药物(SX,I期化合物,可能为CYP3A4抑制剂和MDZ,一种参考CYP3A4底物),没有使用基于生理学的药代动力学(PBPK)预测,群体PK建模和多响应最佳设计的任何体内数据。方法:使用AcslXtreme开发PBPK模型,仅使用体外数据模拟两种药物共同给药时的PK谱。然后,使用模拟数据,使用NONMEM开发种群PK模型,并通过使用两个无响应设计(UD)或具有联合采样时间的多响应设计(MD)通过PopDes优化种群Fisher信息矩阵的行列式,确定最佳采样时间。两种药物。最后,通过计算和计算CL / F的相对均方根误差(RMSE)和经验相对标准误差(RSE),通过NONMEM仿真和重新估计来评估D最优采样时间设计。结果:SX和MDZ的UD中分别有四个和五个最佳采样时间(= 9个不同的采样时间),而MD仅有五个采样时间。无论设计和化合物如何,都可以对CL / F进行很好的估计(对于MDZ,RSE <20%,对于SX,RSE <25%),并且PopDes的预期RSE与经验RSE在同一范围内。而且,CL / F估计没有偏差。由于MD与两个UD相比仅需要五个采样时间,因此MD的D最优采样时间被包括在拟议临床试验的完整经验设计中。联合论文将设计与实际数据进行了比较。结论:这种包括PBPK模拟,总体PK建模和多反应最佳设计的全球方法允许在没有任何体内数据的情况下使用稀疏采样进行临床试验的设计,该方法能够估计CYP3A4底物的CL / F和潜在的抑制剂。 -一起管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号