...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Physics, B. Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics: An Institute of Physics Journal >Dielectronic recombination of heavy species: The tin 4p~64d ~q - 4p~64d~((q - 1))4f + 4p~54d ~((q + 1)) transition arrays for q = 1-10
【24h】

Dielectronic recombination of heavy species: The tin 4p~64d ~q - 4p~64d~((q - 1))4f + 4p~54d ~((q + 1)) transition arrays for q = 1-10

机译:重物种的双电子重组:q = 1-10的锡4p〜64d〜q-4p〜64d〜((q-1))4f + 4p〜54d〜((q + 1))过渡阵列

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We report on detailed calculations of dielectronic recombination (DR) rate coefficients for Sn~(4 +)-Sn~(13 +) using three approaches of differing degrees of complexity. These are configuration-mixed Breit-Pauli using the autostructure code, bundled-nl using the Burgess-Bethe general program (BBGP) and configuration average (CA) using the DRACULA code. We find that target Δn = 0 dipole promotions dominate the total DR rate coefficients; configuration-mixing effects are small for the totals; results for the totals are highly dependent on the initial levels averaged over - the results for averaging over all levels of the ground configuration being typically nearly a factor of 2 smaller than for using only the ground level. On comparing the total DR rate coefficients obtained using the three methods we find that the BBGP results are systematically lower than those obtained from autostructure - in some cases they are significantly lower (by a factor of 2) - while the CA results are systematically and significantly higher (by up to 80%) in general. These findings need to be borne in mind for the finite-density modelling of tin plasma sources for microlithography and tin markers for magnetic fusion plasmas especially when using simple descriptions of DR. They apply also to heavy species in general such as tungsten ions which are of great importance for magnetic fusion plasmas.
机译:我们报告了三种不同复杂程度的方法对Sn〜(4 +)-Sn〜(13 +)的双电子复合(DR)速率系数的详细计算。这些是使用自动结构代码进行配置混合的Breit-Pauli,使用Burgess-Bethe通用程序(BBGP)进行捆绑的nl,以及使用DRACULA代码进行的配置平均值(CA)。我们发现目标Δn= 0偶极子提升控制了总DR速率系数;总体而言,配置混合效果很小;总计的结果高度依赖于平均初始水平-在地面配置的所有水平上平均的结果通常比仅使用地面水平小近2倍。通过比较使用这三种方法获得的总DR速率系数,我们发现BBGP结果在系统上低于从自动结构获得的结果-在某些情况下,它们显着较低(降低2倍)-而CA结果在系统上且明显通常更高(最高80%)。这些发现需要牢记用于微光刻的锡等离子体源和用于磁聚变等离子体的锡标记的有限密度建模,尤其是在使用DR的简单描述时。它们通常还适用于重物质,例如钨离子,这对磁聚变等离子体非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号