首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >Perceived Past, Present, and Future Control and Adjustment to Stressful Life Events
【24h】

Perceived Past, Present, and Future Control and Adjustment to Stressful Life Events

机译:感知过去,现在和将来对压力性生活事件的控制和适应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Perceived control is a central construct in psychology and is key to understanding individual differences in poststress outcomes (Frazier, Berman, & Steward, 2001). The goals of the current studies (using 4 samples of undergraduate students, total N = 1,421) were to examine the relations between different aspects of perceived control and poststress outcomes and to differentiate perceived control over specific events from related constructs (i.e., general control beliefs, coping strategies). To accomplish these goals, we first developed a new measure of perceived past, present, and future control over stressful life events. The data supported the content validity, factor structure, internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity of the new measure. Consistent with the temporal model of control (Frazier et al., 2001), these 3 forms of control had very different relations with adjustment. Present control was consistently related to lower distress levels in cross-sectional, longitudinal, and prospective analyses. Present control also predicted outcomes beyond the effects of general control beliefs and coping strategies. Past and future control had nonsignificant or positive relations with distress, although future control was associated with better outcomes (i.e., course grades) when the stressor was controllable. Thus, our measure can be used to assess the relations between perceived past, present, and future control and outcomes across a range of stressors. Because the relations between these 3 forms of control and outcomes differ markedly, measures that combine these aspects of control hinder the understanding of the important role of perceived control in adjustment to stress.
机译:知觉控制是心理学的中心建构,是理解后应激结果中个体差异的关键(Frazier,Berman和Steward,2001)。当前研究的目标(使用4个本科生样本,总计N = 1,421)旨在检验感知控制的不同方面与后应激结果之间的关系,并区分对特定事件的感知控制与相关构造(即一般控制信念) ,应对策略)。为了实现这些目标,我们首先开发了一种新方法,用于衡量压力性生活事件的过去,现在和将来的控制方式。数据支持新措施的内容效度,因素结构,内部一致性和重测信度,以及收敛性和判别力。与时间控制模型一致(Frazier等,2001),这三种形式的控制与调节之间有着非常不同的关系。目前的控制与横截面,纵向和前瞻性分析中较低的遇险水平始终相关。目前的控制还预测了超出一般控制信念和应对策略影响的结果。过去和将来的控制与痛苦的关系不显着或呈正比关系,尽管在压力源可控的情况下,将来的控制与更好的结果(即课程成绩)相关。因此,我们的度量可用于评估一系列压力源中过去,现在和将来的控制与结果之间的关系。因为这三种形式的控制与结果之间的关系明显不同,所以将控制的这些方面结合起来的措施阻碍了对感知控制在调节压力中的重要作用的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号