首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >There is not yet strong evidence that exercise regimens other than pelvic floor muscle training can reduce stress urinary incontinence in women: A systematic review
【24h】

There is not yet strong evidence that exercise regimens other than pelvic floor muscle training can reduce stress urinary incontinence in women: A systematic review

机译:尚无有力的证据表明,除了盆底肌肉训练以外的运动方式可以减轻女性的压力性尿失禁:一项系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Question: What evidence is there for alternative exercises to specific pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women? Design: A systematic review was conducted with searches of PubMed and PEDro to January 2013. The quality of randomised trials was evaluated using the PEDro scale. Each type of exercise was classified as being in a Development Phase, Testing Phase, or Refinement and Dissemination Phase. Participants: Women with stress or mixed urinary incontinence with predominantly stress urinary incontinence. Intervention: Exercise regimens other than pelvic floor muscle training. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was urinary leakage. Results: Seven randomised controlled trials were found: three on abdominal training, two on the Paula method, and two on Pilates exercise. The methodological quality score ranged between 4 and 8 with a mean of 5.7. There was no convincing evidence for the effect of these exercise regimens so they remain in the Testing Phase. Because no randomised trials were found for posture correction, breathing exercise, yoga, Tai Chi, and general fitness training, these were classified as being in the Development Phase. Conclusion: There is not yet strong evidence that alternative exercise regimens can reduce urinary leakage in women with stress urinary incontinence. Alternative exercise regimens should not yet be recommended for use in clinical practice for women with stress urinary incontinence.
机译:问题:有什么证据可以代替特定的骨盆底肌肉训练来治疗女性压力性尿失禁?设计:对截至2013年1月的PubMed和PEDro进行了系统评价。使用PEDro量表评估了随机试验的质量。每种类型的练习都分为开发阶段,测试阶段或优化和传播阶段。参加者:患有压力或混合性尿失禁,主要是压力性尿失禁的妇女。干预:除了骨盆底肌肉训练以外的锻炼方法。结果措施:主要结果是尿漏。结果:发现了七项随机对照试验:三项在腹部训练中进行,两项在Paula方法上进行,两项在普拉提运动中进行。方法学质量得分在4到8之间,平均为5.7。没有令人信服的证据表明这些运动方案的效果,因此它们仍处于测试阶段。由于未发现有关姿势矫正,呼吸运动,瑜伽,太极拳和一般健身训练的随机试验,因此将其归为开发阶段。结论:尚无强有力的证据表明,替代运动疗法可以减少压力性尿失禁妇女的尿液渗漏。对于压力性尿失禁的女性,尚不建议在临床实践中使用替代运动方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号