首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Periodontology >Comparative efficacy of stabilized stannous fluoride/sodium hexametaphosphate dentifrice and sodium fluoride/triclosan/copolymer dentifrice for the prevention of periodontitis in xerostomic patients: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
【24h】

Comparative efficacy of stabilized stannous fluoride/sodium hexametaphosphate dentifrice and sodium fluoride/triclosan/copolymer dentifrice for the prevention of periodontitis in xerostomic patients: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.

机译:稳定的氟化亚锡/六偏磷酸钠钠和氟化钠/三氯生/共聚物洁齿剂对干口病患者牙周炎的预防效果比较:一项为期2年的随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of a stannous fluoride (SnF2) dentifrice relative to a positive control triclosan dentifrice for prevention of clinical attachment loss (CAL) in xerostomic patients. A secondary objective was to compare the dentifrices for root caries remineralization. METHODS: This was a 2-year, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group study. A 0.454% SnF2/sodium hexametaphosphate dentifrice was tested versus a positive control dentifrice (sodium fluoride/0.30% triclosan/copolymer) in 440 medication-induced xerostomic adults identified in a 1-year, run-in phase (no treatment) as high risk for periodontitis and root caries. During the study phase, subjects were stratified based on gender and attachment level into two groups. Subjects brushed twice a day for 60 seconds using their assigned product. Clinical examinations including probing depth, attachment level, bleeding on probing, and root caries remineralization were performed at baseline and 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 334 subjects were evaluable. During run-in, average CAL relative to initial examination was 1.33 mm. Probing depth increased 0.95 mm. At year 2 in the treatment phase, attachment gain was 0.77 mm for the test group and 0.79 mm for the control group versus baseline. Probing depth decreased 0.57 mm for the test group, similar to the control group (0.53 mm). These changes versus baseline were statistically significant (P <0.01) for each group. Products were not statistically significantly different from each other. Both treatments resulted in similar remineralization for root caries lesions at study completion (P = 0.40). CONCLUSION: The results establish comparable benefits for the SnF2 dentifrice in preventing CAL and root caries versus the sodium fluoride/triclosan/copolymer control in xerostomic patients.
机译:背景:这项研究的主要目的是比较氟化亚锡(SnF2)洁牙剂与阳性对照三氯生洁牙剂在预防干口病患者中临床依从性丧失(CAL)的功效。第二个目标是比较牙粉对龋齿再矿化的作用。方法:这是一项为期2年的随机双掩盖平行组研究。在1年的磨合期(未治疗)中确定了440例药物诱导的干性成年人中,测试了0.454%的SnF2 /六偏磷酸钠与阳性对照洁齿剂(氟化钠/0.30%三氯生/共聚物)的高风险用于牙周炎和龋齿。在研究阶段,根据性别和依恋程度将受试者分为两组。受试者使用分配的产品每天刷两次,持续60秒。在基线,1年和2年进行了临床检查,包括探查深度,附着水平,探查出血和龋齿再矿化。结果:总共334名受试者是可评估的。在磨合期间,相对于初始检查的平均CAL为1.33毫米。探测深度增加了0.95毫米。在治疗阶段的第2年,与基线相比,测试组的附着增益为0.77 mm,对照组的附着增益为0.79 mm。测试组的探查深度减少了0.57 mm,与对照组(0.53 mm)相似。每组的这些变化与基线相比均具有统计学意义(P <0.01)。产品在统计学上没有显着差异。两种治疗均在研究完成时导致类似的再矿化龋齿病变(P = 0.40)。结论:与氟代/三氯生/共聚物控制相比,SnF2洁牙剂在预防CAL和根龋方面具有可比的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号