...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Periodontology >Histologic comparison of healing after ridge preservation using human demineralized bone matrix putty with one versus two different-sized bone particles
【24h】

Histologic comparison of healing after ridge preservation using human demineralized bone matrix putty with one versus two different-sized bone particles

机译:用一种和两种不同大小的骨颗粒的人用脱矿质骨基质腻子保存preservation后愈合的组织学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Ridge preservation can minimize the loss of alveolar bone subsequent to tooth extraction in preparation for implant therapy. The purpose of this study is to histologically and clinically comparehuman demineralized bone matrix (DBM) putty with one size of bone particles (SPS) to human DBM putty with two different sizes of bone particles (multiple particle sizes [MPS]) in ridge preservation after molar extractions. Methods: Molar tooth extraction and ridge preservation were performed in 20 participants for each treatment group.Approximately 20 weeks after grafting, core biopsies were obtained during implant placement and analyzed under light microscopy. Specimens were analyzed for the percentage area of vital bone, residual graft particles, and non-mineralized structures (connective tissue/other non-mineralized tissue [CT]).Changes in alveolar ridge dimensions were also determined. Results: Sixteen participants in the SPS group and 14 in the MPS group completed the study. The SPS group had amean of 49% vital bone, 8% residual graft, and 43% CT. The MPS group had 53%, 5%, and 42%, respectively. Patients in both groups lost a mean of <1 mm alveolar height on the buccal and lingual aspects and <1.5mmof total ridge width. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for any clinical or histologic parameters. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that addition of larger bone particles to DBM putty does not offer additional benefit in the preservation of alveolar bone after the extraction of molar teeth.
机译:背景:保留牙槽脊可以最大程度地减少拔牙后的牙槽骨损失,为植入物治疗做准备。这项研究的目的是在组织学和临床上比较具有一种大小的骨颗粒(SPS)的人软化骨基质(DBM)腻子与具有两种不同大小的骨颗粒(多种粒径[MPS])的人DBM腻子磨牙提​​取。方法:每个治疗组的20名参与者进行了磨牙拔牙和牙槽preservation保存。移植后约20周,在植入物植入过程中获得了核心活检,并在光学显微镜下进行了分析。分析标本中的活骨,残余移植物颗粒和非矿化结构(结缔组织/其他非矿化组织[CT])的百分比面积。还确定了牙槽尺寸的变化。结果:SPS组的16位参与者和MPS组的14位参与者完成了研究。 SPS组具有49%的重要骨骼,8%的残余移植物和43%的CT椎弓根。 MPS组分别有53%,5%和42%。两组患者的颊侧和舌侧平均牙槽高度均<1mm,而牙槽total的总宽度均<1.5mm。两组在任何临床或组织学参数上均无统计学上的显着差异。结论:这项研究的结果表明,在拔除磨牙后,向DBM油灰中添加较大的骨颗粒不会对牙槽骨的保存提供额外的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号