...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Periodontology >Amine fluoride/stannous fluoride and chlorhexidine mouthwashes as adjuncts to single-stage dental implants: a comparative study.
【24h】

Amine fluoride/stannous fluoride and chlorhexidine mouthwashes as adjuncts to single-stage dental implants: a comparative study.

机译:氟化胺/氟化亚锡和洗必泰漱口水作为单阶段牙科植入物的辅助剂:一项比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The growing popularity of non-submerged dental implants in recent years requires a greater emphasis on microbial plaque control. Chlorhexidine (CHX), the most commonly used mouthwash in implant surgery, is sometimes associated with tooth staining and alteration in taste perception. Amine fluoride/stannous fluoride (AmF/SnF2) mouthwash has been shown to have anti-infective properties; however, it has not been tested as an adjunct anti-infective means in non-submerged dental implants. The purpose of this trial was to compare AmF/SnF2 and CHX mouthwashes as adjuncts to single-stage dental implants. METHODS: Thirty-three patients aged 34 to 79 (mean 54.30 +/- 8.69 SD) requiring dental implants were accepted into the study. Following comprehensive periodontal therapy patients received one to three non-submerged dental implants (maxilla: 17; mandible: 45; anterior: 3, posterior: 59). After surgery patients were given analgesics and antibiotics as well as 2,400 ml of coded mouthwash bottles previously randomized between the two above mentioned formulations. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline and 3 and 12 months post-surgery. RESULTS: Twelve-month survival rates were 100% and 92.9% for the AmF/SnF2 and CHX groups, respectively. Compliance was slightly higher in the AmF/SnF2 group (84.35% +/- 3.39% versus 78.15% +/- 4.59% SE) but statistically similar. There was no statistically significant difference between the AmF/SnF2 and CHX groups in staining index at 3 months (1.519 +/- 0.22 versus 1.457 +/- 0.24 SE) and patient subjective evaluation of the mouthwashes. Radiographic bone loss was 0.79 +/- 0.23 and 1 +/- 0.13 SE at 3 months and 1.06 +/- 0.13 and 1.27 +/- 0.25 at 12 months for the CHX and AmF/SnF2 groups, respectively; the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.388 and 0.504, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both CHX and AmF/SnF2 mouthwashes can be used post-surgically after one-stage implant surgery.
机译:背景:近年来,非淹没式牙科植入物的日益普及要求对微生物菌斑的控制给予更大的重视。洗必泰(CHX)是植入手术中最常用的漱口水,有时与牙齿染色和味觉改变有关。氟化胺/氟化亚锡(AmF / SnF2)漱口水已被证明具有抗感染性能;但是,尚未在非浸入式牙科植入物中将其作为辅助抗感染手段进行测试。该试验的目的是比较AmF / SnF2和CHX漱口水作为单阶段牙科植入物的辅助剂。方法:33名年龄34至79岁(平均54.30 +/- 8.69 SD)的需要牙种植体的患者被纳入研究。在全面的牙周治疗之后,患者接受了1-3个非浸入式牙科植入物(上颌骨:17;下颌骨:45;前牙:3,后牙:59)。手术后给患者服用止痛药和抗生素,以及事先随机分配在上述两种配方之间的2,400 ml编码漱口水瓶。在基线以及手术后3个月和12个月记录临床和放射学参数。结果:AmF / SnF2和CHX组的十二个月生存率分别为100%和92.9%。 AmF / SnF2组的依从性略高(SE为84.35%+/- 3.39%,SE为78.15%+/- 4.59%),但统计学上相似。在3个月时,AmF / SnF2和CHX组之间的染色指数(1.519 +/- 0.22对1.457 +/- 0.24 SE)和患者对漱口液的主观评价之间在统计学上没有显着差异。 CHX和AmF / SnF2组在3个月时的放射学骨丢失分别为0.79 +/- 0.23和1 +/- 0.13 SE,在12个月时分别为1.06 +/- 0.13和1.27 +/- 0.25。差异无统计学意义(分别为P = 0.388和0.504)。结论:CHX和AmF / SnF2漱口水均可在一阶段植入手术后进行手术后使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号