首页> 外文期刊>Journal of perinatology: Official journal of the California Perinatal Association >Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure support: to sync or not to sync? Pressure support or no pressure support?
【24h】

Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure support: to sync or not to sync? Pressure support or no pressure support?

机译:同步间歇性强制通风和压力支持:要同步还是不同步?有压力支持还是没有压力支持?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mechanical ventilation has changed dramatically over the past few years with the explosion of technology. Asynchronous breathing is extremely common in intubated newborn infants. Asynchronous breathing has been shown to be associated with short-term adverse effects such as delivery of inconsistent tidal volume and minute ventilation, hypercarbia, hypoxemic episodes, increased energy expenditure, increased need for sedation and paralysis, decreased venous return, increase in intraventricular hemorrhage and fluctuations in blood pressure. It is now feasible to deliver synchronized breaths with the currently available ventilators to most patients in the newborn intensive care unit. Synchronized ventilation with pressure support of each spontaneous breath is physiological, decreases the work of breathing imposed by the endotracheal tube and has been shown to avoid most of the problems associated with asynchronous ventilation.
机译:在过去的几年中,随着技术的发展,机械通风发生了巨大变化。异步呼吸在插管新生儿中非常普遍。异步呼吸已被证实与短期不良反应有关,例如潮气量和分钟通气量不一致,高碳酸血症,低氧发作,能量消耗增加,镇静和麻痹的需要增加,静脉回流减少,脑室内出血和血压波动。现在,在新生儿重症监护病房中,使用当前可用的呼吸机向大多数患者提供同步呼吸是可行的。在每次自发呼吸的压力支持下进行同步通气是生理上的,它减少了气管内导管施加的呼吸功,并且已被证明可以避免大多数与异步通气有关的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号