...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Perinatal Medicine >Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome.
【24h】

Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome.

机译:产前胎儿心率描记的视觉分析:观察者之间和观察者之间的一致性以及对新生儿结局知识的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer agreement of visual analysis of fetal heart rate tracing and to evaluate the bias introduced by knowledge of perinatal outcome in this interpretation. METHODS: One hundred tracings were independently analyzed by four observers. In a second study period, two observers re-analysed the 100 tracings in order to evaluate intra-observer agreement. The other two observers re-analyzed the tracings, which were labelled with fictitious perinatal outcome to evaluate the impact of this information on reliability. Agreement was analyzed by means of the proportion of agreement for qualitative parameters and the inter- and intra-class correlation coefficient for quantitative data. RESULTS: Poor agreement was found for quantitative variability, low variability category and number of decelerations. Moderate agreement was observed for baseline, normal variability category and number of accelerations. Fetal heart rate variability and number of accelerations and decelerations were found to be significantly influenced by clinical information of perinatal outcome. Biased observers showed lower reliability than unbiased ones. CONCLUSION: Visual assessment of fetal heart rate tracings is unreliable due to low rates of agreement between and within observers. Only qualitative classification such as normal baseline and normal variability showed good agreement. Knowledge of clinical information introduces subjectivity to the visual analysis, leading to a negative impact on reliability.
机译:目的:评估观察者之间和观察者内部对胎儿心率追踪进行视觉分析的一致性,并评估围产期结局知识在此解释中所引起的偏见。方法:由四名观察员独立分析了一百次示踪。在第二个研究阶段,两名观察员重新分析了100条示踪图,以评估观察员内部的一致性。其他两名观察员重新分析了这些追踪,并用虚构的围产期结局进行了标记,以评估该信息对可靠性的影响。通过定性参数的一致性比例和定量数据的类内和类内相关系数分析一致性。结果:在数量变异性,低变异性类别和减速度数量上发现一致性差。在基线,正常可变性类别和加速次数方面观察到适度的一致性。围产期结局的临床信息显着影响胎儿心率变异性以及加速和减速的次数。偏见的观察者显示出比无偏见的观察者低的可靠性。结论:由于观察者之间和观察者之间的同意率低,视觉评估胎儿心率追踪不可靠。只有定性分类(例如正常基线和正常变异性)显示出良好的一致性。临床信息知识为视觉分析带来了主观性,从而对可靠性产生了负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号