首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >Which treatment approach is better for hemiplegic shoulder pain in stroke patients: intra-articular steroid or suprascapular nerve block? A randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Which treatment approach is better for hemiplegic shoulder pain in stroke patients: intra-articular steroid or suprascapular nerve block? A randomized controlled trial.

机译:哪种治疗方法更适合中风患者的偏瘫肩痛:关节内类固醇或肩cap上神经阻滞?一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine which injection technique was effective for patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. DESIGN: Randomized prospective double-blind study. SETTING: Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit. INTERVENTION: Patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain were recruited over a 12-month period and all were hospitalized in our clinic. Intra-articular steroid injection or suprascapular nerve block was performed on all patients. MAIN MEASURES: Range of motion values at the moment that pain started (range of motion A) and passive maximum range of motion values (range of motion B) were recorded. Pain intensity levels (visual analogue scale) at these two range of motion values (pain A and pain B) were also taken. Evaluations were made before the injection, and 1 hour, one week and one month after the injection. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study, the mean age was 61.53 +/- 10.30 years. The mean time since injury was 8.69 +/- 15.71 months. The aetiology was ischaemic in 16 (61%) patients. Intra-articular steroid injection was performed in 11 (42 %) patients, and suprascapular nerve block in 15 (57%) patients. Range of motion A and range of motion B were changed statistically in repeated measures. There were important differences in repeated measures of pain intensity levels at these two range of motion values (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were determined in all measurements between intra-articular steroid injection and suprascapular nerve block groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that neither injection technique was superior to the other. Both injection procedures are safe and have a similar effect in stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain.
机译:目的:确定哪种注射技术对偏瘫性肩痛患者有效。设计:随机前瞻性双盲研究。单位:脑损伤康复科。干预:招募了偏瘫性肩痛的患者,时间为12个月,所有患者均在我们的诊所住院。所有患者均进行了关节内类固醇注射或肩cap上神经阻滞。主要指标:记录疼痛开始时的运动值范围(运动范围A)和被动最大运动值范围(运动B)。还记录了这两个运动值范围(疼痛A和疼痛B)的疼痛强度水平(视觉模拟评分)。在注射前以及注射后1小时,1周和1个月进行评估。结果:该研究纳入了26名患者,平均年龄为61.53 +/- 10.30岁。自受伤以来的平均时间为8.69 +/- 15.71个月。 16例(61%)患者的病因是缺血性的。 11例(42%)患者进行了关节内类固醇注射,15例(57%)患者进行了肩ras上神经阻滞。在重复测量中,运动范围A和运动范围B在统计学上发生了变化。在这两个运动值范围内,重复测量疼痛强度水平存在重要差异(P <0.05)。然而,在关节内类固醇注射和肩cap上神经阻滞组之间的所有测量结果中均未发现显着差异(P> 0.05)。结论:我们的结果表明,两种注射技术都不比另一种更好。两种注射方法对偏瘫性肩痛的卒中患者都是安全的,并且具有相似的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号