...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology >Diagnosis of sclerosing cholangitis in children: Blinded, comparative study of magnetic resonance versus endoscopic cholangiography
【24h】

Diagnosis of sclerosing cholangitis in children: Blinded, comparative study of magnetic resonance versus endoscopic cholangiography

机译:儿童硬化性胆管炎的诊断:磁共振与内镜胆道造影的盲法比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) has been validated as comparable to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) for the diagnosis of sclerosing cholangitis (SC) in adult patients. In children, MRC is widely used based mainly on non-comparative studies. Patients and methods: ERCs and MRCs of seven children (median age 9, range: 7-20. years) with SC and 17 controls (median age 6, range: 2. months-20. years) with other chronic liver diseases were reviewed in a blinded, random and independent way. All patients underwent both examinations within a 6-months slot. All ERCs and 17 MRCs were performed under general anesthesia. One radiologist evaluated both ERCs and MRCs and one interventional endoscopist independently reviewed only ERCs. Reviewers did not receive any clinical information. Diagnosis of SC, established on the basis of history, laboratory data, radiological examinations and clinical course, was used as gold standard to compare ERC and MRC diagnostic accuracy. Results: Overall image quality was graded as very good in 57% of MRC and in 71% of ERC cases; difference was not statistically significant (P= 0.24) although the probability for MRC to be diagnostic increased with patient's age. Depiction of first, second and fourth-order intrahepatic bile duct was better in ERC (P= 0.004, 0.02 and 0.023, respectively); depiction of the extrahepatic bile duct was comparable (P= 0.052). Diagnostic accuracy of MRC and ERC was very high, without statistically significant difference (P= 0.61). Conclusion: Despite an overall better depiction of the biliary tree by ERC, MRC is comparable for the diagnosis of SC in children. These data support MRC as the first imaging approach in children with suspected SC.
机译:背景:磁共振胆管造影(MRC)已被证实可与内镜逆行胆管造影(ERC)媲美,用于诊断成人患者的硬化性胆管炎(SC)。在儿童中,MRC主要基于非比较研究而被广泛使用。患者和方法:回顾了7名患有SC的儿童(中位年龄,范围:7-20。岁)的ERC和MRC和17名患有其他慢性肝病的对照(中位年龄,范围6:2.-20岁)。以盲目,随机和独立的方式。所有患者均在6个月内接受了两次检查。所有ERC和17例MRC均在全身麻醉下进行。一名放射科医生对ERC和MRC进行了评估,而一名介入内镜医师仅对ERC进行了独立审查。审稿人未收到任何临床信息。根据病史,实验室数据,放射学检查和临床过程建立的SC诊断被用作比较ERC和MRC诊断准确性的金标准。结果:在57%的MRC和71%的ERC病例中,总体图像质量被评为非常好;差异无统计学意义(P = 0.24),但随着患者年龄的增长,诊断出MRC的可能性也会增加。在ERC中,一,二,四阶肝内胆管的描绘更好(分别为P = 0.004、0.02和0.023);肝外胆管的描述可比(P = 0.052)。 MRC和ERC的诊断准确性非常高,没有统计学上的显着差异(P = 0.61)。结论:尽管ERC可以更好地描绘胆道树,但MRC在儿童SC诊断中具有可比性。这些数据支持MRC作为可疑SC患儿的第一种影像学检查方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号