...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic trauma >Orthogonal pin construct versus parallel uniplanar pin constructs for pelvic external fixation: a biomechanical assessment of stiffness and strength.
【24h】

Orthogonal pin construct versus parallel uniplanar pin constructs for pelvic external fixation: a biomechanical assessment of stiffness and strength.

机译:用于骨盆外固定的正交销构造与平行单平面销构造:刚度和强度的生物力学评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the structural stiffness of an orthogonal pelvic external fixator pin construct with 2 different parallel external fixator pin constructs in a simulated bone model. HYPOTHESIS: An orthogonal pelvic external fixator pin construct would be significantly more stiff than a parallel pin construct when loaded in-plane under similar conditions. DESIGN: Thirty synthetic pelvic bone models were configured with orthogonal pins (group 1), parallel iliac crest pins (group 2), or parallel supra-acetabular pins (group 3). Specimens were loaded either in-plane (flexion/extension moment) or out-of-plane (internal/external rotation moment) to assess construct stiffness. SETTING: Orthopaedic industry mechanical testing laboratory (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahwah, NJ). INTERVENTION: Single load cycle to failure with load application modified to assess stiffness both in-plane and out-of-plane with the pin constructs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pelvic external fixation pin construct stiffness. RESULTS: Stiffness for in-plane loading was 150.2 +/- 51.2 N/mm for the orthogonal pin construct, 105.0 +/- 46.9 N/mm for the iliac crest pin construct, and 104.7 +/- 20.7 N/mm for the supra-acetabular pin construct. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated that the difference was significant (P < 0.05) between groups 1 and 2 and groups 1 and 3 but not between groups 2 and 3. Stiffness for out-of-plane loading was 49.6 +/- 3.4 N/mm for the orthogonal pin construct, 53.9 +/- 3.5 N/mm for the iliac crest pin construct, and 100.6 +/- 4.3 N/mm for the supra-acetabular pin construct, with significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups 1 and 3 and groups 2 and 3 but not between groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: An orthogonal pelvic external fixator pin construct produced a significantly stiffer construct for in-plane loading (flexion/extension moment) compared with either parallel pin construct; however, a parallel supra-acetabular pin construct was stiffer for out-of-plane loading.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是在模拟骨模型中比较正交骨盆外固定器销钉结构与2种不同的平行外固定器销钉结构的结构刚度。假设:当在相似的条件下平面内加载时,正交的骨盆外固定器销钉结构比平行的销钉结构要坚硬得多。设计:用正交销(第1组),平行parallel骨销(第2组)或平行髋臼上销(第3组)配置了30种合成骨盆模型。样品在平面内(弯曲/延伸力矩)或平面外(内部/外部旋转力矩)加载,以评估结构刚度。地点:骨科工业机械测试实验室(Stryker Orthopedics,新泽西州马瓦)。干预:通过修改载荷应用以评估销钉结构在平面内和平面外的刚度,可以使单个载荷循环失效。主要观察指标:骨盆外固定钉结构刚度。结果:正交钉构造的平面内载荷刚度为150.2 +/- 51.2 N / mm,the钉构造的平面内载荷刚度为105.0 +/- 46.9 N / mm,同上的刚度为104.7 +/- 20.7 N / mm -髋臼针构造。成对比较表明,第1组和第2组之间以及第1组和第3组之间的差异是显着的(P <0.05),但第2组和第3组之间的差异不明显。正交钉构造,,骨钉构造为53.9 +/- 3.5 N / mm,髋臼上钉构造为100.6 +/- 4.3 N / mm,第1组,第3组和第3组之间存在显着差异(P <0.05)第2和第3组,但不在第1和第2组之间。结论:与任一平行销结构相比,正交的骨盆外固定器销结构产生的平面内载荷(屈曲/伸展力矩)明显更硬。但是,平行的髋臼上钉结构在平面外载荷时较硬。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号