首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic science : >Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system.
【24h】

Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system.

机译:用于评估脚踝关节疾病的标准评估系统的开发和可靠性I:标准评估系统的开发。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the five scales comprising the rating system that the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) devised (JSSF standard rating system) and the newly offered interpretations and criteria for determinations of each assessment item. METHODS: We produced the new scales for the JSSF standard system by modifying the clinical rating systems established by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS scales) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association's foot rating scale (JOA scale). We also provided interpretations of each assessment item and the criteria of determinations in the new standard system. RESULTS: We improved the ambiguous expressions and content in the conventional standard rating systems so they would be easily understood by Japanese people. The result was five scales in total. Four were designed for use specifically for ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal, and lesser metatarsophalangeal-ineterphalangeal sites; and the fifth was for the foot and ankle with rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, we described interpretations and criteria for determinations with regard to evaluation items in each scale. CONCLUSIONS: Conventionally, the AOFAS scales or the JOA scale have been separately applied depending on the sites or disorders concerned, but it was often difficult to decide on scores during practical evaluations because of differing expressions in different languages and also because of ambiguity in the interpretation of each evaluation item and in scoring standards as well. JSSF improved these scales and added definite interpretations of evaluation items as well as criteria for the rating (to be reported here in part I). Because these steps were expected to improve the reliability of outcomes assessed by each scale, we examined the reliability in scores of the newly developed scales, which are reported in part II (in this issue).
机译:背景:本研究的目的是报告五种量表,包括日本足外科学会(JSSF)设计的评分系统(JSSF标准评分系统)以及新提供的用于确定每个评估项目的解释和标准。方法:我们通过修改由美国矫形足踝学会(AOFAS量表)和日本骨科学会的足部评定量表(JOA量表)建立的临床评定系统,为JSSF标准系统创建了新的量表。我们还提供了每个评估项目的解释以及新标准体系中确定标准。结果:我们改进了常规标准评分系统中的歧义表达和内容,因此日本人容易理解它们。结果是总共五个量表。设计了四个专门用于踝后足,中足,拇指hall趾间指间和较小的less趾间肋间部位;第五是风湿性关节炎的脚和脚踝。此外,我们描述了每种规模评估项目的解释和确定标准。结论:常规上,AOFAS量表或JOA量表是根据所涉及的部位或疾病单独应用的,但是由于在不同语言中的表达方式不同以及解释的含糊不清,在实际评估过程中通常难以决定分数。每个评估项目的得分以及得分标准。 JSSF改进了这些量表,并添加了对评估项目的明确解释以及评级标准(将在第一部分中进行报告)。由于这些步骤有望提高每种量表评估结果的可靠性,因此,我们在第二部分(本期)中对新开发的量表的分数进行了检验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号