Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Ortega Alicia; Sarmiento J. Manuel; Patil Chirag; Mukherjee Debraj; Ugiliweneza Beatrice; Nuno Miriam; Lad Shivanand; Boakye Maxwell

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurological surgery, Part A. Central European neurosurgery >Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

机译：腰椎管狭窄症住院和门诊棘突间置入装置的比较分析

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

PurposeTo compare reoperations, health care utilization, and costs in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients undergoing interspinous process (ISP) device placement in an inpatient versus outpatient setting.

机译：目的比较住院患者和门诊患者中接受棘突间（ISP）装置放置的腰椎管狭窄症（LSS）患者的再手术，医疗保健利用和费用。

著录项

来源
《Journal of neurological surgery, Part A. Central European neurosurgery》 |2015年第6期|共8页
作者
Ortega Alicia; Sarmiento J. Manuel; Patil Chirag; Mukherjee Debraj; Ugiliweneza Beatrice; Nuno Miriam; Lad Shivanand; Boakye Maxwell;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类头部及神经外科学;
关键词
lumbar spinal stenosis; interspinous process device; decompressive surgery; reoperation; health care utilization;

机译：腰椎管狭窄症;棘突间装置;减压手术;再手术;卫生保健利用;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J] . Ortega Alicia, Sarmiento J. Manuel, Patil Chirag, Journal of neurological surgery, Part A. Central European neurosurgery . 2015,第A6期

机译：腰椎管狭窄症住院和门诊棘突间置入装置的比较分析
2. Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis [J] . Yijian Zhang, Dongdong Lu, Wei Ji, Journal of Orthopaedic Translation . 2021,第1期

机译：这是腰椎狭窄的最有效的治疗方法：减压，融合或梭菌过程装置？贝叶斯网络元分析
3. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety between Interspinous Process Distraction Device and Open Decompression Surgery in Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta Analysis [J] . Hong Peiwei, Liu Yao, Li Hedong Journal of investigative surgery: The official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research . 2015,第1期

机译：棘突间牵引装置与开放减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效和安全性比较：Meta分析
4. A comparative study on spatio-temporal parameters of walking gait of patients with Lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration [C] . Z. S. Shima Bahrami, Faezeh Eskandari, Ahmad R. Arshi, International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation . 2017

机译：腰椎管狭窄合并腰椎间盘退变患者步行步态时空参数的比较研究
5. Effectiveness of a Manual Therapy Approach in Treatment of Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [D] . Ramadan, Haitham. 2019

机译：手动疗法对腰椎管狭窄症患者的疗效
6. Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression fusion or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis [O] . Yijian Zhang, Dongdong Lu, Wei Ji, 2021

机译：这是腰椎狭窄的最有效的治疗方法：减压融合或梭菌过程装置？贝叶斯网络元分析
7. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: Randomized controlled trial [O] . Moojen W.A. (Wouter), Arts M.P. (Mark), Jacobs W.C.H. (WIlco), 2013

机译：棘突间器械与标准常规手术减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症：随机对照试验

Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅