首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery >Are maxillomandibular fixation screws a better option than erich arch bars in achieving maxillomandibular fixation? A randomized clinical study
【24h】

Are maxillomandibular fixation screws a better option than erich arch bars in achieving maxillomandibular fixation? A randomized clinical study

机译:在实现上颌骨固定中,上颌骨固定螺钉是否比富足弓杆更好的选择?随机临床研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this study is to see the efficacy of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) screws with arch bars and to compare the plaque index in between 2 methods of MMF. Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized clinical trial. The study sample was derived from the population of patients who reported to Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wardha, Maharasthra, India between October 2006 and September 2008 and who required MMF. The patients were assessed for the time required in minutes for the placement and removal of screws and arch bar. Postoperative stability after achieving the MMF of both groups was analyzed and the plaque that was accumulated in both groups was evaluated by using TURESKYGILMOREGLICKMAN modification of the QUIGLEYHEIN plaque index. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS statistical software for Windows, version 8.0 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL) using the χ 2 test and Student t test. Results: The average working time for placement and removal of MMF screws is 18.67 minutes and 10.20 minutes, respectively, and for arch bars is 95.06 minutes and 29 minutes, respectively. The mean value of plaque index in group I is 1.88 and in group II is 2.69. It signifies that plaque deposition was more in group II. No occlusal disturbance was seen in both groups. Incidence of MMF screws causing damage to tooth root is 5.81% and incidence of screw breakage was seen in 3.33% of patients. Conclusions: Oral hygiene maintenance is better in patients with MMF screws than with arch bars with fewer complications and less operating time. Erich arch bars are the preferred choice in patients who require long-term MMF, because the screws start loosening after 5 to 6 weeks.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是观察带弓杆的上颌下固定(MMF)螺钉的疗效,并比较两种MMF方法之间的斑块指数。材料和方法:本研究是一项随机临床试验。该研究样本来自于2006年10月至2008年9月间向印度马哈拉斯特拉邦Wardha口腔颌面外科部门报告并需要MMF的患者人群。以分钟为单位评估了患者放置和移除螺钉和弓形杆所需的时间。分析两组达到MMF后的术后稳定性,并通过对QUIGLEYHEIN斑块指数进行TURESKYGILMOREGLICKMAN修饰,评估两组中积累的斑块。使用适用于Windows的8.0版SPSS统计软件(SPSS,Inc,Chicago,IL),使用χ2检验和St​​udent t检验进行统计分析。结果:放置和卸下MMF螺钉的平均工作时间分别为18.67分钟和10.20分钟,而弓形杆的平均工作时间分别为95.06分钟和29分钟。 I组斑块指数的平均值为1.88,II组为2.69。这表明在第二组中斑块沉积更多。两组均未见咬合障碍。 MMF螺钉导致牙根损伤的发生率为5.81%,3.33%的患者发现螺钉断裂的发生率。结论:MMF螺钉患者的口腔卫生维护比弓形棒更好,并发症更少,手术时间更少。对于需要长期MMF的患者,Erich弓杆是首选,因为螺钉会在5至6周后开始松动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号