首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery >Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
【24h】

Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.

机译:正畸固定微型植入物稳定性的相关因素:对台湾414个样本的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate failure rates and factors associated with the stability of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 166 patients (35 male patients and 131 female patients) who had consecutively received mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage at the Section of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) from January 2001 to December 2006. A total of 414 mini-implants with diameters ranging from 1.2 to 2.0 mm were evaluated. Clinical variables for analysis were divided into host-related and implant-related factors. Mini-implants that could be maintained for orthodontic anchorage for more than 6 months were considered to be successful. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate the failure rate in our study cohort and to identify possible associated factors. RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 10.1% (42 of 414 screws) with orthodontic force loading for more than 6 months. Most failures were due to loosening and occurred within the first 2 weeks. Differences in overall failure rates for the maxilla and mandible (9.3% and 16.3%, respectively) were not statistically significant. A lower failure rate was found for the maxilla with implant diameters equal to or less than 1.4 mm (P = .036). The left side had a lower failure rate than the right (6.7% vs 13.9%, P = .019). Length and type of mini-implants, age, and gender were not associated with mini-implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: Use of mini-implants for anchorage is reliable. In our study the overall success rate was 89.9%. Careful diameter selection for different locations is essential. In the maxilla an implant diameter equal to or less than 1.4 mm is recommended. In the mandible an implant diameter larger than 1.4 mm is suggested for better orthodontic anchorage. Hygienic care of implantation sites should also be emphasized for long-term success of mini-implant anchorage.
机译:目的:评估失败率和与用于正畸固定的微型植入物的稳定性相关的因素。患者与方法:我们招募了2001年1月至12月在台湾台北荣民总医院正畸与儿科牙科科连续接受微型植体做正畸固定的166例患者(男35例,女131例)。 2006年。总共评估了414个直径在1.2到2.0毫米之间的微型植入物。用于分析的临床变量分为宿主相关因素和植入物相关因素。可以进行正畸固定的微型植入物超过6个月被认为是成功的。统计分析用于评估我们研究队列中的失败率,并确定可能的相关因素。结果:正畸力负荷超过6个月,总体失败率为10.1%(414颗螺钉中的42颗)。大多数故障是由于松动造成的,并且发生在最初的2周内。上颌骨和下颌骨的总失败率差异(分别为9.3%和16.3%)在统计学上没有显着差异。发现植入物直径等于或小于1.4 mm的上颌骨的失败率较低(P = .036)。左侧的故障率低于右侧(6.7%对13.9%,P = .019)。微型植入物的长度和类型,年龄和性别与微型植入物衰竭无关。结论:使用微型植入物锚固是可靠的。在我们的研究中,总体成功率为89.9%。必须仔细选择不同位置的直径。在上颌骨中,建议植入物直径等于或小于1.4毫米。在下颌骨中,建议使用直径大于1.4毫米的植入物以更好地进行正畸固定。微型植入物的长期成功还应强调对植入部位的卫生护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号