首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pain and symptom management. >Dealing with requests for euthanasia: interview study among general practitioners in Belgium.
【24h】

Dealing with requests for euthanasia: interview study among general practitioners in Belgium.

机译:处理安乐死的要求:比利时全科医生的访谈研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: In many countries, physicians are confronted with requests for euthanasia. Notwithstanding that euthanasia is legally permitted in Belgium, it remains the subject of intense debate. OBJECTIVES: To gather in-depth empirical data on how general practitioners (GPs) deal with these requests in Belgium. METHODS: Mortality follow-back study in 2005-2006 via the nationwide Sentinel Network of General Practitioners. Standardized face-to-face interviews were conducted with GPs for all the reported patients who did not die suddenly or totally unexpectedly at home, as judged by the GP. RESULTS: We conducted 205 interviews. Of these, 27 patients had at some point expressed a wish to receive a drug administered by a physician with the explicit intention to end life, that is, euthanasia. Thirteen of these formulated their requests explicitly and repeatedly, according to their GP. Compared with patients who expressed a wish but not an explicit/repeated request for euthanasia, those patients' requests were more often documented (8 of 13 vs. 2 of 14; P=0.01), and reiterated until their final days of life (6 of 13 vs. 0 of 14; P=0.02). Five patients received euthanasia. For the other 22 patients, GPs gave different reasons for not acceding to the request, often related to criteria stipulated in the Belgian law on euthanasia, and sometimes related to personal reasons. CONCLUSION: It is not uncommon for patients to ask their GP for euthanasia, although explicit requests remain relatively rare. Requests tend to vary widely in form and content, and far more are expressed than complied with. For many GPs, the Belgian law on euthanasia serves as a guiding principle in this decision-making process, although in a minority of the cases, a GP's personal opinion toward euthanasia seems to be decisive.
机译:背景:在许多国家,医生面临安乐死的要求。尽管比利时法律允许安乐死,但安乐死仍然是激烈辩论的主题。目的:收集关于全科医生如何处理比利时的这些要求的深入经验数据。方法:2005-2006年通过全国普通从业者哨兵网络进行的死亡率追踪研究。根据全科医生的判断,对所有报告的在家中并非突然死亡或完全意外死亡的患者进行了全科医生的标准化面对面访谈。结果:我们进行了205次采访。其中,有27位患者表示希望接受由医生管理的明确旨在终止生命的药物,即安乐死。根据他们的GP,其中13个明确且反复提出了他们的要求。与表达希望但未明确/重复安乐死的患者相比,这些患者的请求被更频繁地记录(13个中的8个vs 14个中的2个; P = 0.01),并且一直重复到他们生命的最后几天(6 13对比0的14; P = 0.02)。五例患者接受了安乐死。对于其他22位患者,全科医生给出了不同意该请求的原因,通常与比利时安乐死法中规定的标准有关,有时与个人原因有关。结论:尽管明确的要求仍然很少见,但患者向全科医生要求安乐死并不罕见。请求的形式和内容往往相差很大,表达的数量远远超过了所遵守的数量。对于许多全科医生而言,比利时的安乐死法是该决策过程的指导原则,尽管在少数情况下,全科医生对安乐死的个人看法似乎是决定性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号