...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Engineering Communications >Gravitational Search, Monkey, and Krill Herd Swarm Algorithms for Phase Stability, Phase Equilibrium, and Chemical Equilibrium Problems
【24h】

Gravitational Search, Monkey, and Krill Herd Swarm Algorithms for Phase Stability, Phase Equilibrium, and Chemical Equilibrium Problems

机译:用于相稳定性,相平衡和化学平衡问题的引力搜索,猴子和磷虾群算法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Phase equilibrium calculations (PECs) and phase stability (PS) analysis of reactive and nonreactive systems problems are important for the simulation and design of chemical engineering processes. These problems, which are challenging, multi-variable, and non-convex, require optimization techniques that are both efficient and effective in finding the solution. Stochastic global optimization algorithms, especially swarm algorithms, are promising tools for such problems. In this study, monkey algorithm (MA), gravitational search algorithm (GSA), and Krill Herd algorithm (KHA) were used to solve PS, phase equilibrium, and chemical equilibrium problems. We have also studied the effect of adding a local optimizer at the end of the stochastic optimizer run. The results were compared to determine the strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm. When a local optimizer was used, MA was found to be a reliable algorithm in solving the problems. GSA had relatively the least numerical effort for all problems among the three algorithms but with low reliability. KHA was more reliable than other two algorithms without the use of a local optimizer. The performance of GSA, MA, and KHA was compared with firefly algorithm and cuckoo search (CS). In summary, this study found that CS algorithm was more reliable than the newly tested algorithms. Nevertheless, MA and GSA algorithms, when combined with a local optimizer, solve the thermodynamic problems as reliably and efficiently as CS.
机译:反应性和非反应性系统问题的相平衡计算(PEC)和相稳定性(PS)分析对于化学工程过程的仿真和设计非常重要。这些具有挑战性,多变量和非凸性的问题需要有效且有效的优化技术来找到解决方案。随机全局优化算法,尤其是群体算法,是解决此类问题的有前途的工具。在这项研究中,使用猴子算法(MA),重力搜索算法(GSA)和Krill Herd算法(KHA)来解决PS,相平衡和化学平衡问题。我们还研究了在随机优化程序运行结束时添加本地优化程序的效果。比较结果以确定每种算法的优缺点。当使用本地优化器时,MA被认为是解决问题的可靠算法。对于这三种算法中的所有问题,GSA的数值工作量相对最少,但可靠性较低。不使用局部优化器,KHA比其他两种算法更可靠。将GSA,MA和KHA的性能与萤火虫算法和布谷鸟搜索(CS)进行了比较。总而言之,这项研究发现CS算法比新测试的算法更可靠。但是,MA和GSA算法与本地优化程序结合使用时,可以像CS一样可靠,高效地解决热力学问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号