首页> 外文期刊>CNS drugs >Early switching strategies in antidepressant non-responders: Current evidence and future research directions
【24h】

Early switching strategies in antidepressant non-responders: Current evidence and future research directions

机译:抗抑郁药无反应者的早期转换策略:当前证据和未来研究方向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Studies have found that up to two-thirds of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not fully respond to the first antidepressant. While switching antidepressants is a common strategy for antidepressant non-responders, there is still a lack of consensus about the optimal timing of a switch. Many clinicians wait for 6-12 weeks before considering a switch. The objectives of this paper are to (1) review the evidence for positive and negative predictive value (NPV) of early improvement at 2-4 weeks to predict final antidepressant response; (2) review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examine early switching strategies; and (3) provide future research directions and clinical recommendations for timing of antidepressant switching. We conducted a literature search for English-language studies via PubMed and Google Scholar, from 1984 to May 2013, with the following terms: 'antidepressants', 'MDD', 'time course', 'trajectory', 'early response', 'onset', 'delayed response', 'early improvement', 'predictors', 'switch', 'combination therapy', and 'augmentation'. Replicated evidence indicates that lack of early improvement (e.g. <20 % reduction in a depression scale score) at 2-4 weeks can be an accurate predictor to identify eventual non-responders. The NPVs suggest that only about one in five patients with lack of improvement at 4 weeks will have a response by 8 weeks. Three RCTs examined early switch strategies, but results are inconsistent and comparisons limited by methodological differences. Future studies should incorporate a standard consensus definition of early improvement, discern whether the effect of early switching is specific to certain types of antidepressants, and determine whether early switch is superior to other strategies such as augmentation or combination. Notwithstanding these limitations, there is reasonable evidence to recommend earlier assessment for improvement. If there is no indication of early improvement at 2-4 weeks after starting an antidepressant, and taking into account other patient and clinical factors, a change in management can be considered.
机译:研究发现,多达三分之二的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者对第一种抗抑郁药没有完全反应。尽管转换抗抑郁药是抗抑郁药无反应者的常见策略,但对于转换的最佳时机仍然缺乏共识。许多临床医生在等待6到12周后才考虑改行。本文的目的是(1)回顾2-4周早期改善的阳性和阴性预测值(NPV)的证据,以预测最终的抗抑郁药反应; (2)审查检查早期转换策略的随机对照试验(RCT); (3)为抗抑郁药转换的时机提供未来的研究方向和临床建议。从1984年至2013年5月,我们通过PubMed和Google Scholar对英语研究进行了文献检索,其中包含以下术语:“抗抑郁药”,“ MDD”,“时程”,“轨迹”,“早期反应”,“发作”,“反应迟缓”,“早期改善”,“预测因素”,“转换”,“联合疗法”和“强化”。有重复的证据表明,在2-4周缺乏早期改善(例如,抑郁量表得分降低<20%)可能是识别最终无反应者的准确预测因子。 NPVs显示,只有约五分之四的患者在4周时没有改善,到8周时才有反应。三个RCT检查了早期转换策略,但结果不一致,且比较受到方法差异的限制。未来的研究应纳入早期改善的标准共识定义,辨别早期转换的效果是否特定于某些类型的抗抑郁药,并确定早期转换是否优于其他策略,例如增强或联合治疗。尽管存在这些局限性,但是有合理的证据建议对改进进行早期评估。如果在开始使用抗抑郁药后的2-4周内没有迹象表明早期改善,并且考虑到其他患者和临床因素,则可以考虑改变治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号