...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >The effect of two exercise regimes; motor control versus endurance/strength training for patients with whiplash-associated disorders: a randomized controlled pilot study.
【24h】

The effect of two exercise regimes; motor control versus endurance/strength training for patients with whiplash-associated disorders: a randomized controlled pilot study.

机译:两种锻炼方式的效果;鞭打相关疾病患者的运动控制与耐力/力量训练:一项随机对照试验研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of exercise regimes with focus on either motor control training or endurance/strength training for patients with whiplash-associated disorders in subacute phase. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: An outpatient spine clinic in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five subjects with a whiplash-associated disorder still having symptoms or disability six weeks after injury.Interventions: The participants received 6-10 sessions of physiotherapy for six weeks with focus on either motor control or endurance and strength of neck muscles. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was the Neck Disability Index. Secondary outcome measures were pain intensity, neck functioning and sick leave. RESULTS: No statistical significant differences concerning primary and secondary outcome measures were demonstrated between the groups. Approximately half of the participants in both groups obtained a clinically important change (improvement) on perceived disability assessed by Neck Disability Index at six weeks and one-year follow-up. The changes within both groups were statistically significant at six weeks, but not at one-year follow-up. For most pain-related variables clinical significant improvement was demonstrated in both groups at six weeks, but for fewer participants at one year. There was also statistical significant improvement within groups in some of the physical performance tests at one-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: The changes associated with motor control training and endurance/ strength training of neck muscles were similar for reduced disability, pain and for improving physical performance. With a low number of participants and no control group, however, we cannot be sure whether the improvements are due to interventions or other reasons.
机译:目的:比较运动方式对亚急性期鞭打相关疾病患者运动控制训练或耐力/力量训练的效果。设计:随机对照试验。地点:挪威的一家门诊脊柱诊所。参与者:25名患有鞭打相关疾病的受试者在受伤后六周仍然有症状或残疾。干预措施:参与者接受了6到10疗程的理疗,持续了六周,重点是运动控制或颈部肌肉的耐力和强度。测量:主要结局指标是颈部残疾指数。次要结果指标为疼痛强度,颈部功能和病假。结果:两组之间在主要和次要结局指标方面均无统计学差异。两组中约有一半的参与者在六周和一年的随访中获得了由颈部残疾指数评估的感知上的残疾的临床重要改变(改善)。两组的变化在6周时有统计学意义,但在一年的随访中没有变化。对于大多数与疼痛有关的变量,两组均在六周时证明了临床显着改善,但一年后参与者较少。在一年的随访中,一些身体机能测试的组内也有统计学上的显着改善。结论:运动控制训练和耐力/颈部肌肉力量训练相关的变化相似,以减少残疾,疼痛并改善身体机能。但是,由于参与者人数少且没有对照组,我们无法确定这些改进是由于干预还是其他原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号