...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Morphology >The controversial origin of the abdominal appendage-like processes in immature insects: Are they true segmental appendages or secondary outgrowths? (Arthropoda hexapoda)
【24h】

The controversial origin of the abdominal appendage-like processes in immature insects: Are they true segmental appendages or secondary outgrowths? (Arthropoda hexapoda)

机译:有争议的未成熟昆虫的腹部附件样突起的起源:它们是真正的节段性附件还是继发性产物? (节肢动物节肢动物)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this article, I review the major characteristics of different types of appendage-like processes that develop at the abdominal segments of many immature insects, and I discuss their controversial morphological value. The main question is whether the abdominal processes are derived from segmental appendages serially homologous to thoracic legs, or whether they are "secondary" outgrowths not homologous with true appendages. Morphological and embryological data, in particular, a comparison with the structure and development of the abdominal appendages in primitive apterygote hexapods, and data from developmental genetics, support the hypothesis of appendicular origin of many of the abdominal processes present in the juvenile stages of various pterygote orders. For example, the lateral processes, such as the tracheal gills in aquatic nymphs of exopterygote insects, are regarded as derived from lateral portions of appendage primordia, homologous with the abdominal styli of apterygotan insects; these processes correspond either to rudimentary telopodites or to coxal exites. The ventrolateral processes, such as the prolegs of different endopterygote insect larvae, appear to be derived from medial portions of the appendicular primordia; they correspond to coxal endites. These views lead to the rejection of Hinton's hypothesis (Hinton [1955] Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 106:455-545) according to which all the abdominal processes of insect larvae are secondary outgrowths not derived from true appendage anlagen.
机译:在本文中,我回顾了在许多未成熟昆虫的腹部发育的不同类型的附件样突起的主要特征,并讨论了它们有争议的形态学价值。主要的问题是腹部突突是源自与胸腿序列同源的节段性附肢,还是它们是与真正的附件不同源的“继发性”产物。形态学和胚胎学数据,特别是与原始斜方六足动物腹部附件的结构和发育的比较,以及来自发育遗传学的数据,支持了各种翼状the幼年期存在的许多腹部突起的阑尾起源的假说订单。例如,侧突,例如外翅类昆虫水生若虫中的气管g,被认为是来源于附肢原基的侧部,与apterygotan昆虫的腹部触针同源。这些过程要么对应于基本的脚手架,要么对应于尾部出口。腹侧突突,例如不同的内翅目昆虫幼虫的前突,似乎起源于阑尾原基的内侧部分。它们对应于尾突。这些观点导致拒绝了欣顿假说(欣顿[1955] Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 106:455-545),根据该假说,所有昆虫幼虫的腹部突起都是次生产物,并非来源于真正的附肢anlagen。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号