首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene >Crystalline silica dust and respirable particulate matter during indoor concrete grinding - wet grinding and ventilated grinding compared with uncontrolled conventional grinding.
【24h】

Crystalline silica dust and respirable particulate matter during indoor concrete grinding - wet grinding and ventilated grinding compared with uncontrolled conventional grinding.

机译:室内混凝土研磨过程中的结晶性二氧化硅粉尘和可吸入颗粒物-湿式研磨和通风式研磨与不受控制的常规研磨相比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effectiveness of wet grinding (wet dust reduction method) and ventilated grinding (local exhaust ventilation method, LEV) in reducing the levels of respirable crystalline silica dust (quartz) and respirable suspended particulate matter (RSP) were compared with that of uncontrolled (no dust reduction method) conventional grinding. A field laboratory was set up to simulate concrete surface grinding using hand-held angle grinders in an enclosed workplace. A total of 34 personal samples (16 pairs side-by-side and 2 singles) and 5 background air samples were collected during 18 concrete grinding sessions ranging from 15-93 min. General ventilation had no statistically significant effect on operator's exposure to dust. Overall, the arithmetic mean concentrations of respirable crystalline silica dust and RSP in personal air samples during: (i) five sessions of uncontrolled conventional grinding were respectively 61.7 and 611 mg/m(3) (ii) seven sessions of wet grinding were 0.896 and 11.9 mg/m(3) and (iii)six sessions of LEV grinding were 0.155 and 1.99 mg/m(3). Uncontrolled conventional grinding generated relatively high levels of respirable silica dust and proportionally high levels of RSP. Wet grinding was effective in reducing the geometric mean concentrations of respirable silica dust 98.2% and RSP 97.6%. LEV grinding was even more effective and reduced the geometric mean concentrations of respirable silica dust 99.7% and RSP 99.6%. Nevertheless, the average level of respirable silica dust (i) during wet grinding was 0.959 mg/m(3) (38 times the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists [ACGIH] threshold limit value [TLV] of 0.025 mg/m(3)) and (ii) during LEV grinding was 0.155 mg/m(3) (6 times the ACGIH TLV). Further studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of a greater variety of models, types, and sizes of grinders on different types of cement in different positions and also to test the simulated field lab experimentation in the field.
机译:比较了湿式研磨(湿式减尘法)和通风式研磨(局部排气通风法,LEV)在降低可吸入结晶硅粉尘(石英)和可吸入悬浮颗粒物(RSP)水平方面的有效性,以及未控制(无除尘法)常规研磨。建立了一个现场实验室,以在封闭的工作场所中使用手持角磨机模拟混凝土表面的磨削。在15至93分钟的18次混凝土碾磨过程中,总共收集了34个个人样品(并排16对和2个单打)和5个背景空气样品。普通通风对操作员接触粉尘没有统计学上的显着影响。总体而言,在以下情况下,个人空气样本中可吸入晶体二氧化硅粉尘和RSP的算术平均浓度:(i)五次常规研磨不受控,分别为61.7和611 mg / m(3)(ii)七次湿研磨为0.896, 11.9 mg / m(3)和(iii)六次LEV研磨分别为0.155和1.99 mg / m(3)。不受控制的常规研磨会产生相对较高水平的可吸入二氧化硅粉尘和相对较高水平的RSP。湿磨有效降低了可吸入二氧化硅粉尘的几何平均浓度98.2%和RSP 97.6%。 LEV研磨更为有效,可吸入二氧化硅粉尘的几何平均浓度降低了99.7%,RSP降低了99.6%。尽管如此,湿磨过程中可吸入二氧化硅粉尘(i)的平均水平为0.959 mg / m(3)(38倍于美国政府工业卫生学家会议[ACGIH]阈限值[TLV]为0.025 mg / m(3)。 )和(ii)在LEV研磨过程中为0.155 mg / m(3)(是ACGIH TLV的6倍)。需要进行进一步的研究,以检查各种型号,类型和尺寸的研磨机在不同位置上不同类型的水泥上的有效性,并在现场测试模拟的现场实验室实验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号