...
【24h】

Patrol Officer Daily Noise Exposure

机译:巡警日常噪音暴露

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous research shows that police officers are at a higher risk for noise induced hearing loss (NIHL). Little data exists on the occupational tasks, outside of the firing range, that might lead to the increased risk of NIHL. The current study collected noise dosimetry from patrol officers in a smaller department and a larger department in southern Wisconsin, United States. The noise dosimeters simultaneously measured noise in three virtual dosimeters that had different thresholds, criterion levels, and exchange rates. The virtual dosimeters were set to: the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) hearing conservation criteria (OSHA-HC), the OSHA permissible exposure level criteria (OSHA-PEL), and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). In addition to wearing a noise dosimeter during their respective work days, officers completed a log form documenting the type of task performed, the duration of that task, if the task involved the use of a siren, and officer characteristics that may have influenced their noise exposure, such as the type of dispatch radio unit worn. Analysis revealed that the normalized 8-hour time weighted averages (TWA) for all officers fell below the recommended OSHA and ACGIH exposure limits. The tasks involving the use of the siren had significantly higher levels than the tasks without (p = 0.005). The highest noise exposure levels were encountered when patrol officers were assisting other public safety agencies such as a fire department or emergency medical services (79 dBA). Canine officers had higher normalized 8-hr TWA noise exposure than regular patrol officers (p = 0.002). Officers with an evening work schedule had significantly higher noise exposure than the officers with a day or night work schedule (p = 0.023). There were no significant differences in exposure levels between the two departments (p = 0.22). Results suggest that this study population is unlikely to experience NIHL as established by the OSHA or ACGIH occupational exposure levels from the daily occupational tasks that were monitored.
机译:先前的研究表明,警察面临的噪音诱发听力损失(NIHL)的风险较高。在射击范围外,关于职业任务的数据很少,可能导致NIHL风险增加。当前的研究从美国威斯康星州南部一个较小部门和一个较大部门的巡逻人员那里收集了噪声剂量测定法。噪声剂量计同时在三个具有不同阈值,标准级别和交换率的虚拟剂量计中测量噪声。虚拟剂量计设置为:职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)听力保护标准(OSHA-HC),OSHA允许接触水平标准(OSHA-PEL)和美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)。除了在各自的工作日佩戴噪声剂量计外,警员还填写了日志表格,记录了所执行任务的类型,任务的持续时间(如果任务涉及警笛的使用)以及可能影响其噪声的警员特征。暴露,例如佩戴的调度无线电单元的类型。分析显示,所有人员的标准化8小时时间加权平均值(TWA)低于建议的OSHA和ACGIH暴露限值。涉及警笛使用的任务比没有警笛的任务具有更高的级别(p = 0.005)。巡逻人员在协助其他公共安全机构(例如消防部门或紧急医疗服务)时遇到最高的噪声暴露水平(79 dBA)。犬警官的标准化8小时TWA噪声暴露高于常规巡逻官(p = 0.002)。有夜班时间表的人员比有白天或夜班时间表的人员的噪声暴露要高得多(p = 0.023)。两个部门之间的接触水平没有显着差异(p = 0.22)。结果表明,该研究人群不太可能经历OSHA或ACGIH从所监测的日常工作任务中得出的职业暴露水平所确定的NIHL。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号