...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene >Validation of the criteria for initiating the cleaning of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) ductwork under real conditions.
【24h】

Validation of the criteria for initiating the cleaning of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) ductwork under real conditions.

机译:验证在实际条件下启动清洁供暖,通风和空调(HVAC)管道系统的标准。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dust accumulation in the components of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems is a potential source of contaminants. To date, very little information is available on recognized methods for assessing dust buildup in these systems. The few existing methods are either objective in nature, involving numerical values, or subjective in nature, based on experts' judgments. An earlier project aimed at assessing different methods of sampling dust in ducts was carried out in the laboratories of the Institut de recherche Robert-Sauve en sante et en securite du travail (IRSST). This laboratory study showed that all the sampling methods were practicable, provided that a specific surface-dust cleaning initiation criterion was used for each method. However, these conclusions were reached on the basis of ideal conditions in a laboratory using a reference dust. The objective of this present study was to validate these laboratory results in the field. To this end, the laboratory sampling templates were replicated in real ducts and the three sampling methods (the IRSST method, the method of the U.S. organization National Air Duct Cleaner Association [NADCA] and that of the French organization Association pour la Prevention et l'Etude de la Contamination [ASPEC]) were used simultaneously in a statistically representative number of systems. The air return and supply ducts were also compared. Cleaning initiation criteria under real conditions were found to be 6.0 mg/100 cm(2) using the IRSST method, 2.0 mg/100 cm(2) using the NADCA method, and 23 mg/100 cm(2) using the ASPEC method. In the laboratory study, the criteria using the same methods were 6.0 for the IRSST method, 2.0 for the NADCA method, and 3.0 for the ASPEC method. The laboratory criteria for the IRSST and NADCA methods were therefore validated in the field. The ASPEC criterion was the only one to change. The ASPEC method therefore allows for the most accurate evaluation of dust accumulation in HVAC ductwork. We therefore recommend using the latter method to objectively assess dust accumulation levels in HVAC ductwork.
机译:供暖,通风和空调(HVAC)系统组件中的灰尘堆积是潜在的污染物源。迄今为止,关于评估这些系统中粉尘堆积的公认方法的信息很少。根据专家的判断,现有的几种方法要么是客观的(涉及数值),要么是主观的。 Robert-Sauve en sante et en securite du Travail研究所(IRSST)的实验室开展了一个较早的项目,旨在评估管道中灰尘的不同采样方法。该实验室研究表明,所有采样方法都是可行的,只要每种方法都使用特定的表面灰尘清洁起始标准即可。但是,这些结论是根据使用参考粉尘的实验室中的理想条件得出的。本研究的目的是验证该领域的实验室结果。为此,在真实管道中复制了实验室采样模板,并采用了三种采样方法(IRSST方法,美国组织国家空气管道清洁器协会[NADCA]和法国组织预防性预防协会等的方法)。在统计上具有代表性的系统中同时使用了Etude de la Contamination(ASPEC)。还比较了回风和送风管道。使用IRSST方法,在实际条件下的清洗起始标准为6.0 mg / 100 cm(2),使用NADCA方法为2.0 mg / 100 cm(2),使用ASPEC方法为23 mg / 100 cm(2)。在实验室研究中,使用相同方法的标准对于IRSST方法为6.0,对于NADCA方法为2.0,对于ASPEC方法为3.0。因此,IRSST和NADCA方法的实验室标准已在现场得到验证。 ASPEC标准是唯一需要更改的标准。因此,ASPEC方法可对HVAC管道中的灰尘堆积进行最准确的评估。因此,我们建议使用后一种方法客观地评估HVAC管道中的灰尘堆积水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号