首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgery. >Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?
【24h】

Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?

机译:随机对照试验和神经外科:理想的选择还是应该考虑替代方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE Randomized -controlled trials (RCTs) are advocated to provide high-level medical evidence. However, in neurosurgery, there are barriers to conducting RCTs. The authors of this study sought to analyze the quality of neurosurgical RCTs since 2000 to determine the adequacy of their design and reporting.
机译:目的提倡随机对照试验(RCT)以提供高级医学证据。但是,在神经外科手术中,进行RCT存在障碍。该研究的作者试图分析自2000年以来神经外科RCT的质量,以确定其设计和报告的充分性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号