...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgery. >Report of 190 consecutive cases of large acoustic tumors (vestibular schwannoma) removed via the translabyrinthine approach.
【24h】

Report of 190 consecutive cases of large acoustic tumors (vestibular schwannoma) removed via the translabyrinthine approach.

机译:190例通过经迷路途径切除的大声肿瘤(前庭神经鞘瘤)报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECT: The choice of approach for surgical removal of large acoustic neuromas is still controversial. The authors reviewed the results in a series of patients who underwent removal of large tumors via the translabyrinthine approach. METHODS: The authors conducted a database analysis of 190 patients (89 men and 101 women) with acoustic neuromas 3 cm or greater in size. The mean age of these patients was 46.1+/-15.6 years. One hundred seventy-eight patients underwent primary translabyrinthine surgical removal and 12 underwent surgery for residual tumor. Total tumor removal was accomplished in 183 cases (96.3%). The tumor was adherent to the facial nerve to some degree in 64% of the cases, but the facial nerve was preserved anatomically in 178 (93.7%) of the patients. Divided nerves were repaired by primary attachment or cable graft. Facial nerve function was assessed immediately after surgery, at the time of discharge, and at 3 to 4 weeks and 1 year after discharge. Excellent function (House-Brackmann facial nerve Grade I or II) was present in 55%, 33.9%, 38.8%, and 52.6% of the patients for each time interval, respectively, with acceptable function (Grades I-IV) in 81% at 1 year. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage that required surgical repair occurred in only 1.1% of the patients and meningitis in 3.7%. There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the translabyrinthine approach for removal of large tumors resulted in good anatomical and functional preservation of the facial nerve, with minimum incidence of morbidity and no incidence of mortality. The authors continue to recommend use of this approach for acoustic tumors larger than 3 cm and for smaller tumors when hearing preservation is not an issue.
机译:目的:手术切除大型听神经瘤的方法的选择仍存在争议。作者回顾了一系列通过经迷路方法切除大肿瘤的患者的结果。方法:作者对190例3厘米或更大的听神经瘤患者(89例男性和101例女性)进行了数据库分析。这些患者的平均年龄为46.1 +/- 15.6岁。 178例患者接受了经迷路的原发手术切除,12例因残留肿瘤接受了手术。 183例(96.3%)完成了总的肿瘤切除。在64%的病例中,肿瘤在一定程度上粘附于面神经,但在178例(93.7%)的患者中,面神经在解剖学上得以保留。分开的神经通过初级附着或电缆移植修复。手术后,出院时,出院后3至4周和1年时评估面部神经功能。在每个时间间隔内,分别有55%,33.9%,38.8%和52.6%的患者表现出出色的功能(House-Brackmann面神经I或II级),可接受的功能(I-IV级)占81%在1年。需要手术修复的脑脊液漏仅发生在1.1%的患者中,而脑膜炎的发生在3.7%。没有死亡。结论:使用经迷路的方法去除大肿瘤可导致面神经的良好解剖学和功能保存,发病率最低,无死亡。作者继续建议对听力大于3 cm的声学肿瘤和较小的肿瘤使用这种方法,以免保留听力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号