首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgery. >The effect of duty hour regulations on outcomes of neurological surgery in training hospitals in the United States: Duty hour regulations and patient outcomes - Clinical article
【24h】

The effect of duty hour regulations on outcomes of neurological surgery in training hospitals in the United States: Duty hour regulations and patient outcomes - Clinical article

机译:美国培训医院的工作时间规定对神经外科手术结局的影响:工作时间规定和患者结果-临床文章

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Object. The effects of sleep deprivation on performance have been well documented and have led to changes in duty hour regulation. New York State implemented stricter duty hours in 1989 after sleep deprivation among residents was thought to have contributed to a patient's death. The goal of this study was to determine if increased regulation of resident duty hours results in measurable changes in patient outcomes. Methods. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures at hospitals with neurosurgery training programs were identified and screened for in-hospital complications, in-hospital procedures, discharge disposition, and in-hospital mortality. Comparisons in the above outcomes were made between New York hospitals and non-New York hospitals before and after the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) regulations were put into effect in 2003. Results. Analysis of discharge disposition demonstrated that 81.9% of patients in the New York group 2000-2002 were discharged to home compared with 84.1% in the non-New York group 2000-2002 (p = 0.6, adjusted multivariate analysis). In-hospital mortality did not significantly differ (p = 0.7). After the regulations were implemented, there was a nonsignificant decrease in patients discharged to home in the non-New York group: 84.1% of patients in the 2000-2002 group compared with 81.5% in the 2004-2006 group (p = 0.6). In-hospital mortality did not significantly change (p = 0.9). In New York there was no significant change in patient outcomes with the implementation of the regulations; 81.9% of patients in the 2000-2002 group were discharged to home compared with 78.0% in the 2004-2006 group (p = 0.3). In-hospital mortality did not significantly change (p = 0.4). After the regulations were in place, analysis of discharge disposition demonstrated that 81.5% of patients in the non-New York group 2004-2006 were discharged to home compared with 78.0% in the New York group 2004-2006 (p = 0.01). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different (p = 0.3). Conclusions. Regulation of resident duty hours has not resulted in significant changes in outcomes among neurosurgical patients.
机译:目的。睡眠剥夺对绩效的影响已得到充分证明,并导致了工作时间规定的变化。在人们认为睡眠不足导致患者死亡之后,纽约州于1989年实施了更严格的工作时间。这项研究的目的是确定增加对住院时间的调节是否会导致患者预后的可测量变化。方法。使用全国住院患者样本(NIS),对接受过神经外科培训计划的医院中接受神经外科手术的患者进行识别,并筛查院内并发症,院内手术,出院情况和院内死亡率。在2003年实施研究生医学教育认可委员会(ACGME)法规之前和之后,在纽约医院和非纽约医院之间对上述结果进行了比较。结果。出院情况的分析表明,纽约组2000-2002年的出院病人中有81.9%出院,而非纽约州2000-2002年的出院病人中有84.1%出院(p = 0.6,调整后的多元分析)。住院死亡率无显着差异(p = 0.7)。实施法规后,非纽约组的出院患者人数没有显着下降:2000-2002年组的患者为84.1%,而2004-2006年组为81.5%(p = 0.6)。住院死亡率没有显着变化(p = 0.9)。在纽约,随着法规的实施,患者的预后没有明显变化。 2000-2002年组中有81.9%的患者出院回家,而2004-2006年组中则为78.0%(p = 0.3)。住院死亡率没有显着变化(p = 0.4)。法规到位后,出院情况分析显示,2004-2006年非纽约组的患者中有81.5%出院,而2004-2006年纽约组中的患者为78.0%(p = 0.01)。院内死亡率无显着差异(p = 0.3)。结论。住院时间的规定并未导致神经外科患者的预后发生重大变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号