...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurophysiology >Functional specialization of medial auditory belt cortex in the alert rhesus monkey.
【24h】

Functional specialization of medial auditory belt cortex in the alert rhesus monkey.

机译:警惕恒河猴中内侧听觉带皮质的功能专业化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Responses of neural units in two areas of the medial auditory belt (middle medial area [MM] and rostral medial area [RM]) were tested with tones, noise bursts, monkey calls (MC), and environmental sounds (ES) in microelectrode recordings from two alert rhesus monkeys. For comparison, recordings were also performed from two core areas (primary auditory area [A1] and rostral area [R]) of the auditory cortex. All four fields showed cochleotopic organization, with best (center) frequency [BF(c)] gradients running in opposite directions in A1 and MM than in R and RM. The medial belt was characterized by a stronger preference for band-pass noise than for pure tones found medially to the core areas. Response latencies were shorter for the two more posterior (middle) areas MM and A1 than for the two rostral areas R and RM, reaching values as low as 6 ms for high BF(c) in MM and A1, and strongly depended on BF(c). The medial belt areas exhibited a higher selectivity to all stimuli, in particular to noise bursts, than the core areas. An increased selectivity to tones and noise bursts was also found in the anterior fields; the opposite was true for highly temporally modulated ES. Analysis of the structure of neural responses revealed that neurons were driven by low-level acoustic features in all fields. Thus medial belt areas RM and MM have to be considered early stages of auditory cortical processing. The anteroposterior difference in temporal processing indices suggests that R and RM may belong to a different hierarchical level or a different computational network than A1 and MM.
机译:在微电极记录中,通过声调,噪声爆发,猴子叫声(MC)和环境声(ES)测试了内侧听觉带两个区域(中间内侧区域[MM]和延髓内侧区域[RM])中神经单元的反应。来自两只机敏的恒河猴。为了进行比较,还从听觉皮层的两个核心区域(主要听觉区域[A1]和延髓区域[R])进行了记录。所有四个场均显示耳蜗组织,在A1和MM中,相对于R和RM,最佳(中心)频率[BF(c)]梯度以相反的方向运行。中间带的特点是,对带通噪声的偏爱要强于对核心区域靠中间的纯音。两个后部(中间)区域MM和A1的响应潜伏期比两个延髓区域R和RM短,对于MM和A1的高BF(c)而言,响应延迟低至6 ms,并且强烈依赖于BF( C)。相比于核心区域,内侧带区域对所有刺激,特别是对噪声爆发的选择性更高。在前场中也发现对音调和噪声爆发的选择性增加。对于高度时间调制的ES,情况恰恰相反。对神经反应结构的分析表明,在所有领域中,神经元都是由低水平的声学特征驱动的。因此,内侧带区域RM和MM必须被视为听觉皮层处理的早期阶段。时间处理指数的前后差异表明,R和RM与A1和MM可能属于不同的层次级别或不同的计算网络。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号