...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nephrology. >Thermal effects of different dialysis techniques and blood pump speeds: an in vitro study.
【24h】

Thermal effects of different dialysis techniques and blood pump speeds: an in vitro study.

机译:不同透析技术和血泵速度的热效应:一项体外研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Thermal effects have a pivotal impact on hemodynamic stability during dialysis procedures. In contrast to conventional dialysis techniques, there are no data in the literature regarding the thermal energy balance during on-line techniques. Secondly, little data exist on the effect of extracorporeal blood pump speed (EBPS) on thermal energy balance. In this study we assessed, first, relative differences in energy transfer rate (ETR) over the extracorporeal circuit during on-line hemo(dia)filtration (H(D)F) procedures and hemodialysis (HD) at different dialysate temperatures during an in vitro procedure using a blood temperature monitor (BTM). Secondly, we assessed the thermal effects of different blood pump speed (BPS) rates during the various treatment modalities. ETR was different among all treatment modalities (p < 0.05) studied, except for HD at 36.5 degrees C vs. pre-dilution hemofiltration (HF) and post-dilution HDF vs. HD at 37.5 degrees C. ETR had the most negative result, indicating the largestenergy loss, during HD at 35.5 degrees C (-58.5.2 +/- 2.6 W), whereas it was almost comparable between pre-dilution HF (-30.7 +/- 4.1 W) and HD at 36.5 degrees C (-35.1.2 +/- 2.4 W). Post-dilution HDF (-17.7 +/- 1.2 W) resulted in an ETR comparable to that of HD at 37.5 degrees C (-15.0 +/- 3.9 W). ETR during post-dilution HF was -43.8 +/- 1.3 W. The thermal effect of the BPS was more pronounced during the procedures with the more negative ETR. In conclusion, on-line techniques and BPS have widely varying effects on ETR during dialysis, which should be considered when the hemodynamic effects among different treatment modalities are compared.
机译:在透析过程中,热效应对血液动力学稳定性具有关键影响。与常规透析技术相比,文献中没有关于在线技术期间热能平衡的数据。其次,关于体外血泵速度(EBPS)对热能平衡的影响的数据很少。在这项研究中,我们首先评估了在线血液(透析)过滤(H(D)F)程序和透析期间不同透析液温度下的血液透析(HD)期间,体外回路中能量转移速率(ETR)的相对差异。使用血液温度监测器(BTM)进行体外操作。其次,我们评估了各种治疗方式期间不同血泵速度(BPS)速率的热效应。在研究的所有治疗方式中,ETR均不同(p <0.05),除了在36.5摄氏度下的HD相对于稀释前血液滤过(HF)和在HD7.5以后的HDF与37.5摄氏度下的HD相比。表明在35.5摄氏度(-58.5.2 +/- 2.6 W)的高清过程中最大的能量损失,而稀释前的HF(-30.7 +/- 4.1 W)和36.5摄氏度的高清(- 35.1.2 +/- 2.4 W)。稀释后的HDF(-17.7 +/- 1.2 W)产生的ETR与37.5摄氏度(-15.0 +/- 3.9 W)的HD相当。稀释后HF期间的ETR为-43.8 +/- 1.3W。在程序中BPS的热效应更加明显,而ETR则更负。总之,在透析过程中,在线技术和BPS对ETR的影响差异很大,在比较不同治疗方式之间的血液动力学效应时应考虑这些因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号