...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nephrology. >Influence of switching connection ports of double-lumen permanent tunnelled catheters on total solute removal during dialysis.
【24h】

Influence of switching connection ports of double-lumen permanent tunnelled catheters on total solute removal during dialysis.

机译:双腔永久穿隧导管的切换端口对透析过程中溶质去除总量的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Catheter dysfunction is a concern when using double-lumen catheters in hemodialysis (HD). Reversing the connection mode results in higher blood flows, but also enhanced recirculation. We evaluated total solute removal (TSR) of different uremic retention solutes during a complete HD session, once with reversed (RL) and once with correctly connected lines (CL). METHODS: Genius dialysis was performed in 22 HD patients at maximum blood flow (QB), once with CL and once with RL. TSR was determined for urea, creatinine, phosphate and ss2-microglobulin (ss2M). Using a kinetic model, we simulated TSR and reduction ratio (RR) for urea for different percentages of access recirculation and different QB during CL vs. RL. RESULTS: RR and TSR of the tested solutes were not different in clinical practice between CL and RL. Mathematically, urea RR did not differ with CL or RL, but TSR decreased by 4.5%-23.3% when changing from CL to RL for a recirculation of 5%-25%, respectively. For a recirculation of 5%-25%, QB in RL should be increased by 6.7% and 52.0%, 8.5% and 72.0%, and 10.0% and 115.2%, respectively, for a blood flow in CL mode of 150, 200 or 250 ml/min. CONCLUSIONS: Connecting patients to double-lumen dialysis catheters in RL does not impair TSR in clinical practice. Mathematically, TSR during RL was dependent upon the obtained QB and degree of recirculation. A nomogram indicating the increase in QB needed in RL to obtain equal TSR as in the CL mode, at different degrees of recirculation, is provided.
机译:简介:在血液透析(HD)中使用双腔导管时,导管功能障碍是一个需要考虑的问题。反转连接模式会导致较高的血流量,但也会增强再循环。我们评估了在一次完整的HD环节中不同尿毒症保留溶质的总溶质去除(TSR),一次使用反向(RL),一次使用正确连接的管线(CL)。方法:在22名HD患者中以最大血流量(QB)进行Genius透析,其中一次使用CL,一次使用RL。测定尿素,肌酐,磷酸盐和ss2-微球蛋白(ss2M)的TSR。使用动力学模型,我们模拟了CL与RL期间尿素的TSR和还原比(RR),用于不同百分比的通路再循环和不同的QB。结果:在临床实践中,CL和RL之间的溶质的RR和TSR并无差异。从数学上讲,尿素RR与CL或RL没有差异,但当从CL更改为RL时,如果再循环5%-25%,TSR降低了4.5%-23.3%。对于5%-25%的再循环,对于CL模式下150、200或90的血流量,RL中的QB应分别增加6.7%和52.0%,8.5%和72.0%,10.0%和115.2%。 250毫升/分钟结论:在临床实践中,将患者连接至RL双腔透析导管不会损害TSR。从数学上讲,RL期间的TSR取决于获得的QB和再循环程度。提供了表示在不同的再循环程度下,为了获得与CL模式相同的TSR所需的RL所需的QB增大的列线图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号