首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nephrology. >Predicting intradialytic hypotension from experience, statistical models and artificial neural networks.
【24h】

Predicting intradialytic hypotension from experience, statistical models and artificial neural networks.

机译:根据经验,统计模型和人工神经网络预测透析内低血压。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic intradialytic hypotension (IDH) associated with increased mortality in hemodialysis patients is difficult to predict and hence prevent. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are promising tools to solve multidimensional non-linear problems. The aim of the study was to verify in which way mathematical models, statistics or knowledge of patients influence the ability of the nephrologists to predict IDH. METHODS: The performance of ANNs was compared with that of independent nephrologists supported by a logistic regression giving odds ratio for each studied variable (NEPHiS) or of nephrologists in charge of the patients without (NEPHc) or with statistical support as for NEPHiS (NEPHcS). Data from 98 hemodialysis patients were analysed in order to select patients with frequent IDH (>10% of the dialysis sessions). Complete data on 1979 dialysis sessions from 7 patients were retrieved. The ability to predict the occurrence of hypotension episodes was compared (ROC curves) between ANNs, NEPHc/S (N=7) in Switzerland and NEPHiS from independent dialysis centers in Western Australia (N=10). RESULTS: ANN gave the most accurate correlation between estimated and observed IHD episodes compared to NEPHc (p<0.001), but a similar performance was attained by NEPHcS (p<0.001). NEPHiS were superior to NEPHc (P<0.05), but inferior to ANN (P<0.01). For a sensitivity of 80%, specificity was 44% for ANNs, 33% for NEPHcS and 20% for NEPHc. CONCLUSIONS: ANNs are superior to nephrologists in predicting IDH episodes; however when supported by a statistical analysis, nephrologists reach ANNs in their prediction ability. IDH still remains difficult to predict even with mathematical models.
机译:背景:与血液透析患者死亡率增加相关的症状性透析内低血压(IDH)难以预测,因此难以预防。人工神经网络(ANN)是解决多维非线性问题的有前途的工具。这项研究的目的是验证数学模型,统计数据或患者知识以何种方式影响肾病学家预测IDH的能力。方法:将神经网络的性能与独立肾病医生的性能进行比较,逻辑回归支持每个研究变量(NEPHiS)的比值比,或者对没有肾病患者(NEPHc)或有NEPHiS统计支持的肾病专家(NEPHcS) 。分析了来自98名血液透析患者的数据,以选择IDH频发(> 10%透析时间)的患者。检索了7位患者1979年透析期间的完整数据。比较了ANN,瑞士的NEPHc / S(N = 7)和西澳大利亚州独立透析中心的NEPHiS(N = 10)之间预测低血压发作发生的能力(ROC曲线)。结果:与NEPHc相比,人工神经网络在估计的IHD发作与观察到的IHD发作之间具有最准确的相关性(p <0.001),但NEPHcS获得了类似的表现(p <0.001)。 NEPHiS优于NEPHc(P <0.05),但次于ANN(P <0.01)。对于80%的敏感性,ANN的特异性为44%,NEPHcS的特异性为33%,NEPHc的特异性为20%。结论:在预测IDH发作方面,人工神经网络优于肾脏科医生。但是,在得到统计学分析的支持下,肾病专家的预测能力达到了人工神经网络。即使使用数学模型,IDH仍然难以预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号