首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neuroimaging >Sources of variability in the detection of cerebral emboli with transcranial Doppler during cardiac surgery.
【24h】

Sources of variability in the detection of cerebral emboli with transcranial Doppler during cardiac surgery.

机译:心脏手术中经颅多普勒检测脑栓子的变异性来源。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The application of intensity thresholds for embolus detection with transcranial Doppler (TCD) can exclude from analysis an unrecognized proportion of high-intensity transient signals (HITS))whose intensities are below the threshold. The lack of consistent threshold criteria between clinical trials may explain part of the discrepancy in the reported HITS counts. We investigated the effect of choosing different thresholds on the sensitivity and specificity of detecting HITS during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: Two observers independently analyzed TCD recordings from 8 patients under CPB. Doppler signals were classified as true HITS, equivocal HITS, artifacts, and Doppler speckles according to preestablished criteria. The relative intensity of Doppler signals was measured by two different methods (TCD software vs manual). Receiver Operating Characteristic curves determined the optimal threshold for each of the two intensity methods. RESULTS: Reviewers achieved agreement in 96% of 2190 Doppler signals (kappa = 0.90). Relative intensities calculated with the TCD-software method were 3 dB (95% CI: 3.0-3.4) higher than the manual method. The optimal threshold was found at 10 dB (sensitivity: 99%; specificity: 90.8%) with the software method and at 7 dB with the manual method (sensitivity: 96%; specificity: 83%). The use of an intensity threshold 2 dB higher than the optimal increased the rejection of true HITS by 8% and 14%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using intensity thresholds higher than the optimal for embolus detection decreases HITS counts. Choosing a threshold depends on the type of method used for measuring the signal intensity. Uniform threshold criteria and comparative studies between different Doppler devices are necessary for making clinical trials more comparable.
机译:目的:将强度阈值用于经颅多普勒(TCD)栓塞检测可以从分析中排除强度低于阈值的高强度瞬态信号(HITS)未被识别的比例。临床试验之间缺乏一致的阈值标准可能解释了所报告的HITS计数的部分差异。我们调查了选择不同阈值对体外循环(CPB)期间检测HITS的敏感性和特异性的影响。方法:两名观察员独立分析了CPB下8例患者的TCD记录。根据预先建立的标准,将多普勒信号分类为真实HITS,模棱两可的HITS,伪像和多普勒斑点。多普勒信号的相对强度通过两种不同的方法(TCD软件与手册)进行测量。接收器工作特性曲线确定了两种强度方法中每种方法的最佳阈值。结果:审阅者在2190个多普勒信号中有96%达成了共识(kappa = 0.90)。用TCD软件方法计算的相对强度比手动方法高3 dB(95%CI:3.0-3.4)。使用软件方法发现最佳阈值为10 dB(灵敏度:99%;特异性:90.8%),使用手动方法发现最佳阈值为7 dB(灵敏度:96%;特异性:83%)。比最佳值高2 dB的强度阈值的使用分别使真实HITS的抑制率分别提高了8%和14%。结论:使用强度阈值高于栓塞检测最佳阈值可以降低HITS计数。选择阈值取决于用于测量信号强度的方法的类型。为了使临床试验更具可比性,必须有统一的阈值标准和不同多普勒设备之间的比较研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号