首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Can Enhanced Recovery Pathways Improve Outcomes of Vaginal Hysterectomyα Cohort Control Study
【24h】

Can Enhanced Recovery Pathways Improve Outcomes of Vaginal Hysterectomyα Cohort Control Study

机译:增强的恢复途径可以改善阴道子宫切除术的结果吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Study Objective: To assess the effect of enhanced recovery pathway implementation on patient outcomes after vaginal hysterectomy (VH) performed to treat benign indications. Design: Case-control study examining outcome measures including length of stay, pain scores, postoperative morbidity, and readmission rates after implementation of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) program for VH (Canadian Task Force classification II). Setting: Teaching hospital. Patients: Fifty patients who underwent VH after implementation of ERAS were compared with 50 control patients before ERAS. Patients were matched for age, indication for surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and surgeon. Intervention: ERAS pathway. Measurements and Main Results: Length of stay, percentage of patients discharged within 24hours, use of urinary catheter and vaginal packing, and readmission rates were determined. Perioperative expenditures were compared, and cost-effectiveness of ERAS was assessed. Median patient vs control age (49.0 vs 51.0years), parity (2.0 vs 2.0), and body mass index (26.5 vs 28.3) were statistically comparable. After ERAS implementation, the median length of stay was reduced by 51.6% (22.0 vs 45.5hours; p<.01), and the percentage of patients discharged within 24hours was increased by 5-fold (78.0 vs 15.6%; p<.05). Frequency of catheter use (82.0% vs 95.6%) and use of vaginal packing (52.0 vs 82.2%) were significantly lower in the post-ERAS group, and these devices were removed earlier (14.5 vs 23.7hours and 16.0 vs 23.0hours, respectively; p<.05 in all cases). Attendance in the Accident and Emergency Department (12.0% vs 0%; p>.05) and inpatient readmission rate (4.0% vs 0%; p>.05) were similar in both groups. Despite having to start a "gynecology school" and employ a specialist Enhanced Recovery nurse, a cost savings of 9.25% per patient was demonstrated. Conclusion: The ERAS program in benign VH reduces length of stay by 51.6% and enables more women to be discharged within 24hours, with no increase in patient readmissions rates.
机译:研究目的:评估增强的恢复途径实施对行子宫良性适应症的阴道子宫切除术(VH)后患者预后的影响。设计:病例对照研究,检查结果指标,包括住院时间,疼痛评分,术后发病率和实施VH术后增强恢复(ERAS)计划后的再入院率(加拿大工作组II级)。地点:教学医院。患者:将实施ERAS后接受VH治疗的50例患者与ERAS实施前的50例对照患者进行比较。对患者进行年龄,手术适应证,美国麻醉医师学会等级和外科医生的匹配。干预:ERAS途径。测量和主要结果:确定住院时间,24小时内出院患者的百分比,导尿管和阴道包装的使用以及再入院率。比较了围手术期的支出,并评估了ERAS的成本效益。患者的中位年龄与对照年龄(49.0 vs 51.0岁),胎次(2.0 vs 2.0)和体重指数(26.5 vs 28.3)在统计学上具有可比性。在实施ERAS后,中位住院时间减少了51.6%(22.0比45.5小时; p <.01),并且24小时内出院的患者百分比增加了5倍(78.0比15.6%; p <.05) )。在ERAS后组中,使用导管的频率(82.0%对95.6%)和使用阴道填充物的频率(52.0对82.2%)显着降低,并且这些设备被更早移除(分别为14.5对23.7小时和16.0对23.0小时) ;在所有情况下p <.05)。两组急诊科的出勤率(12.0%vs 0%; p> .05)和住院再入院率(4.0%vs 0%; p> .05)相似。尽管必须开办“妇科学校”并聘请专业的增强康复护士,但事实证明,每位患者可节省9.25%的费用。结论:良性VH的ERAS计划可将住院时间缩短51.6%,并使更多的妇女在24小时内出院,而患者的再入院率却没有增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号