首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences >Value of general surgical risk models for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic resections for pancreatobiliary carcinomas
【24h】

Value of general surgical risk models for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic resections for pancreatobiliary carcinomas

机译:普通外科手术风险模型对胰腺胆管癌胰腺切除术后并发症发生率和死亡率的预测价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The present study evaluated the utility of general surgical risk models to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in the specialty field of pancreatic resections for pancreatobiliary carcinomas. Methods We investigated Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS), its modified version (mE-PASS), and Portsmouth Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) in 231 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy (Group A). We also analyzed E-PASS and mE-PASS in another cohort of the same procedures (Group B, n = 313). Results Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for detecting in-hospital mortality in Group A were moderate at 0.75 for E-PASS, 0.69 for mE-PASS, and 0.69 for P-POSSUM. The predicted mortality rates of the models significantly correlated with severity of postoperative complications (ρ = 0.17, P = 0.011 for E-PASS; ρ = 0.15, and P = 0.027 for P-POSSUM). The AUCs were also moderate in Group B at 0.68 for E-PASS and 0.69 for mE-PASS. The predicted mortality rates significantly correlated with severity of postoperative complications (ρ = 0.18, P = 0.0018 for E-PASS; ρ = 0.17, and P = 0.0022 for mE-PASS). Conclusions The present study suggests that the predictive powers of general risk models may be moderate in pancreatic resections. A novel model would be desirable for these procedures.
机译:背景技术本研究评估了一般外科手术风险模型在预测胰腺胆管癌胰腺切除术专业领域的术后发病率和死亡率方面的实用性。方法我们调查了231例行胰十二指肠切除术或手术的患者的生理能力和手术压力(E-PASS),其修改版本(mE-PASS)和朴茨茅斯生理和手术严重程度评分(P-POSSUM),以了解其病死率和发病率远端胰腺切除术(A组)。我们还在另一组相同程序(B组,n = 313)中分析了E-PASS和mE-PASS。结果用于检测A组住院死亡率的接受者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积中等,E-PASS为0.75,mE-PASS为0.69,P-POSSUM为0.69。模型的预测死亡率与术后并发症的严重程度显着相关(E-PASS为ρ= 0.17,P = 0.011; P-POSSUM为ρ= 0.15,P = 0.027)。 B组的AUC也中等,E-PASS为0.68,mE-PASS为0.69。预测的死亡率与术后并发症的严重程度显着相关(对于E-PASS,ρ= 0.18,P = 0.0018;对于mE-PASS,ρ= 0.17,P = 0.0022)。结论本研究表明,一般风险模型的预测力在胰腺切除术中可能是中等的。对于这些程序,将需要一种新颖的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号