...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurotrauma >Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Score and Pupillary Reaction To Predict Six-Month Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison of Field and Admission Assessment
【24h】

Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Score and Pupillary Reaction To Predict Six-Month Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison of Field and Admission Assessment

机译:格拉斯哥昏迷量表运动评分和瞳孔反应可预测颅脑外伤患者的六个月死亡率:实地和入院评估的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and pupillary reactivity are well-known prognostic factors in traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to compare the GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity assessed in the field and at hospital admission and assess their prognostic value for 6-month mortality in patients with moderate or severe TBI. We studied 445 patients with moderate or severe TBI from Austria enrolled to hospital in 2009-2012. The area under the curve (AUC) and Nagelkerke's R-2 were used to evaluate the predictive ability of GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity assessed in the field and at admission. Uni- and multi-variable analyses-adjusting for age, other clinical, and computed tomography findings-were performed using combinations of field and admission GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity. Motor scores generally deteriorated from the field to admission, whereas pupillary reactivity was similar. GCS motor score assessed in field (AUC=0.754; R-2=0.273) and pupillary assessment at admission (AUC=0.662; R-2=0.214) performed best as predictors of 6-month mortality in the univariate analysis. This combination also showed best performance in the adjusted analyses (AUC=0.876; R-2=0.508), but the performance of both predictors assessed at admission was not much worse (AUC=0.857; R-2=0.460). Field GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity at hospital admission, compared to other combinations of these parameters, possess the best prognostic value to predict 6-month mortality in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. Given that differences in prognostic performance are only small, both the field and admission values of GCS motor score and pupillary reaction may be reasonable to use in multi-variable prediction models to predict 6-month outcome.
机译:格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和瞳孔反应性是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中众所周知的预后因素。这项研究的目的是比较在现场和入院时评估的GCS运动评分和瞳孔反应性,并评估其对中度或重度TBI患者6个月死亡率的预后价值。我们研究了2009-2012年来自奥地利的445例中度或重度TBI患者。曲线下面积(AUC)和Nagelkerke R-2用于评估野外和入院时评估的GCS运动评分和瞳孔反应性的预测能力。结合年龄和入场GCS运动评分和瞳孔反应性,对年龄,其他临床和计算机断层扫描结果进行单变量和多变量分析。从田野到入院,运动评分通常会下降,而瞳孔反应性相似。在单变量分析中,在野外评估的GCS运动评分(AUC = 0.754; R-2 = 0.273)和入院时的瞳孔评估(AUC = 0.662; R-2 = 0.214)表现最佳,可作为6个月死亡率的预测指标。这种组合在调整后的分析中也显示出最佳性能(AUC = 0.876; R-2 = 0.508),但是入院时评估的两个预测指标的性能并没有差很多(AUC = 0.857; R-2 = 0.460)。与这些参数的其他组合相比,现场GCS运动评分和入院时瞳孔反应性具有最佳的预后价值,可预测中度至重度TBI患者的6个月死亡率。鉴于预后表现的差异很小,因此在多变量预测模型中预测GCS运动评分和瞳孔反应的视野值和入院值均可以合理预测6个月的结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号