首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral implants research >Comparisons of bacterial patterns present at implant and tooth sites in subjects on supportive periodontal therapy.
【24h】

Comparisons of bacterial patterns present at implant and tooth sites in subjects on supportive periodontal therapy.

机译:支持性牙周治疗对象中植入物和牙齿部位细菌分布的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objective: (I) To compare the oral microflora at implant and tooth sites in subjects participating in a periodontal recall program, (II) to test whether the microflora at implant and tooth sites differ as an effect of gingival bleeding (bleeding on probing (BOP)), or pocket probing depth (PPD), and (III) to test whether smoking and gender had an impact on the microflora. Material and methods: Data were collected from 127 implants and all teeth in 56 subjects. Microbiological data were identified by the DNA-DNA checkerboard hybridization. Results: PPD>/=4 mm were found in 16.9% of tooth, and at 26.6% of implant sites (P<0.01). Tooth sites with PPD>/=4 mm had a 3.1-fold higher bacterial load than implant sites (mean difference: 66%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 40.7-91.3, P<0.001). No differences were found for the red, orange, green, and yellow complexes. A higher total bacterial load was found at implant sites with PPD>/=4 mm (mean difference 35.7 x 10(5), 95% CI: 5.2 (10(5)) to 66.1 (10(5)),P<0.02 with equal variance not assumed). At implant sites, BOP had no impact on bacterial load but influenced the load at tooth sites (P<0.01). Conclusion: BOP, and smoking had no impact on bacteria at implant sites but influenced the bacterial load at tooth sites. Tooth sites harbored more bacteria than implant sites with comparable PPD. The 4 mm PPD cutoff level influenced the distribution and amounts of bacterial loads. The subject factor is explanatory to bacterial load at both tooth and implant sites. To cite this article: Agerbaek MR, Lang NP, Persson GR. Comparisons of bacterial patterns present at implant and tooth sites in subjects on supportive periodontal therapy. I. Impact of clinical variables, gender and smoking. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01190.x.
机译:摘要目的:(I)比较参加牙周召回计划的受试者在种植体和牙齿部位的口腔菌群,(II)测试在种植体和牙齿部位的菌群是否由于牙龈出血的影响而不同(出血对探查( BOP)或口袋探测深度(PPD),以及(III)测试吸烟和性别对微生物区系是否有影响。材料和方法:数据来自56位受试者的127个植入物和所有牙齿。通过DNA-DNA棋盘杂交鉴定微生物学数据。结果:在牙齿的16.9%和植入部位的26.6%处发现PPD> / = 4 mm(P <0.01)。 PPD> / = 4 mm的牙齿部位的细菌载量比植入部位高3.1倍(平均差异:66%,95%置信区间(CI):40.7-91.3,P <0.001)。没有发现红色,橙色,绿色和黄色络合物的差异。 PPD> / = 4 mm(平均差异35.7 x 10(5),95%CI:5.2(10(5))至66.1(10(5)),P <0.02)的植入部位发现更高的总细菌载量均等)。在种植体部位,BOP对细菌负荷没有影响,但会影响牙齿部位的负荷(P <0.01)。结论:BOP和吸烟对植入部位的细菌没有影响,但会影响牙齿部位的细菌负荷。与可比的PPD相比,牙齿部位所含细菌更多。 PPD的4mm截止水平会影响细菌负荷的分布和数量。该主因可以解释牙齿和植入部位的细菌负荷。引用本文:Agerbaek MR,Lang NP,Persson GR。支持性牙周治疗对象中植入物和牙齿部位细菌分布的比较。一,临床变量,性别和吸烟的影响。临床口语Res。 doi:10.1111 / j.1600-0501.2005.01190.x。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号