...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. >Effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on glial scar formation after spinal cord injury in rats.
【24h】

Effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on glial scar formation after spinal cord injury in rats.

机译:粒细胞集落刺激因子和粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子对大鼠脊髓损伤后神经胶质瘢痕形成的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Object This study investigated the effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on glial scar formation after spinal cord injury (SCI) in rats and compared the therapeutic effects between G-CSF and granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to evaluate G-CSF as a potential substitute for GM-CSF in clinical application. Methods Rats were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: a sham-operated group (Group 1), an SCI group without treatment (Group 2), an SCI group treated with G-CSF (Group 3), and an SCI group treated with GM-CSF (Group 4). G-CSF and GM-CSF were administered via intraperitoneal injection immediately after SCI. The effects of G-CSF and GM-CSF on functional recovery, glial scar formation, and axonal regeneration were evaluated and compared. Results The rats in Groups 3 and 4 showed better functional recovery and more decreased cavity sizes than those in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Both G-CSF and GM-CSF suppressed intensive expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein around the cavity at 4 weeks and reduced the expression of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (p < 0.05). Also, early administration of G-CSF and GM-CSF protected axon fibers from destructive injury and facilitated axonal regeneration. There were no significant differences in comparisons of functional recovery, glial scar formation, and axonal regeneration between G-CSF and GM-CSF. Conclusions G-CSF suppressed glial scar formation after SCI in rats, possibly by restricting the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, which might facilitate functional recovery from SCI. GM-CSF and G-CSF had similar effects on glial scar formation and functional recovery after SCI, suggesting that G-CSF can potentially be substituted for GM-CSF in the treatment of SCI.
机译:目的研究粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)对大鼠脊髓损伤(SCI)后神经胶质瘢痕形成的影响,并比较G-CSF和粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)的治疗作用评估G-CSF在临床应用中可能替代GM-CSF。方法将大鼠随机分为4组中的1组:假手术组(第1组),未治疗的SCI组(第2组),G-CSF治疗的SCI组(第3组)和经C-CSF治疗的SCI组GM-CSF(第4组)。 SCI后立即通过腹膜内注射施用G-CSF和GM-CSF。评估并比较了G-CSF和GM-CSF对功能恢复,神经胶质瘢痕形成和轴突再生的影响。结果与第2组相比,第3和第4组大鼠的功能恢复更好,空腔大小更小(p <0.05)。 G-CSF和GM-CSF均在第4周时抑制了腔周围胶质纤维酸性蛋白的密集表达,并降低了硫酸软骨素蛋白聚糖的表达(p <0.05)。而且,早期施用G-CSF和GM-CSF可保护轴突纤维免受破坏性损伤并促进轴突再生。 G-CSF和GM-CSF之间的功能恢复,神经胶质瘢痕形成和轴突再生的比较没有显着差异。结论G-CSF可能通过限制神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白和硫酸软骨素蛋白聚糖的表达来抑制脊髓损伤后神经胶质瘢痕的形成,这可能有助于脊髓损伤后功能的恢复。 GM-CSF和G-CSF对SCI后的胶质瘢痕形成和功能恢复具有相似的作用,这表明在SCI的治疗中G-CSF可以潜在地替代GM-CSF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号