首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. >Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.
【24h】

Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.

机译:腰椎间盘全瓣置换术,椎间盘切除术和融合术的生物力学比较:对相邻水平椎间盘压力和小关节力的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Object With the increasing advocacy for total disc replacement (TDR) as a potential alternative to fusion in the management of lumbar degenerative disc disease, intradiscal pressures (IDPs) and facet joint stresses at the adjacent levels of spine have generated considerable interest. The purpose of this study was to compare adjacent-level IDPs and facet joint stresses among TDR, discectomy, and fusion. Methods Ten fresh human cadaveric lumbar specimens (L2-S1) were subjected to an unconstrained load in axial torsion, lateral bending, flexion, and extension by using multidirectional flexibility test. Four surgical treatment modes-control (disc intact), discectomy, TDR, and fusion-were tested in sequential order at L4-5. During testing, the IDPs and facet forces following each treatment were calculated at the adjacent vertebral levels (L3-4 and L5-S1). Results Intradiscal pressures and facet force pressures were similar between the intact condition and the TDR reconstruction at the L3-4 and L5-S1 levels under all loading conditions (p > 0.05). Compared with the intact and TDR groups, the discectomy and fusion groups had higher IDPs at the L3-4 and L5-S1 levels under all loading conditions (p < 0.05). No significant difference in the facet force pressure was noted among the intact, discectomy, and TDR groups at the L3-4 and L5-S1 levels under any loading conditions (p > 0.05). However, the facet force pressure produced for fusion was significantly higher than the mean values obtained for the intact, discectomy, and TDR groups at the L3-4 and L5-S1 levels under all loading conditions (p < 0.05). Conclusions Lumbar TDR maintained adjacent-level IDPs and facet force pressures near the values for intact spines, whereas adjacent-level IDPs tended to increase after discectomy or fusion and facet forces tended to increase after fusion.
机译:目的随着越来越多的人主张全椎间盘置换术(TDR)作为腰椎间盘退变性疾病融合治疗的潜在替代方法,椎间盘内压力(IDP)和相邻脊柱水平的小关节应力引起了人们的极大兴趣。这项研究的目的是比较TDR,椎间盘切除术和融合术中相邻水平的IDP和小关节应力。方法采用多向柔性试验,对十只新鲜的人体尸体腰椎标本(L2-S1)进行轴向扭转,横向弯曲,屈曲和伸展的无限制载荷。在L4-5顺序测试了四个手术治疗模式-对照(完整盘),椎间盘切除术,TDR和融合术。在测试期间,在相邻椎骨水平(L3-4和L5-S1)处计算每次治疗后的IDP和刻面力。结果在所有载荷条件下,在L3-4和L5-S1水平下,完好状态与TDR重建之间的车内压力和小平面压力相似(p> 0.05)。与完整组和TDR组相比,在所有负荷条件下,椎间盘切除术和融合组在L3-4和L5-S1水平的IDP更高(p <0.05)。在任何负荷条件下,在L3-4和L5-S1水平下,完整,椎间盘切除术和TDR组之间的小平面压力无明显差异(p> 0.05)。但是,在所有负荷条件下,在L3-4和L5-S1水平下,融合产生的小平面压力明显高于完整,椎间盘切除术和TDR组的平均值(p <0.05)。结论腰椎TDR维持邻近水平的IDP和小面力压力接近完整的脊柱值,而邻近水平的IDP在椎间盘切除术或融合后趋于增加,而融合后的面力趋于增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号