...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. >Evaluation of pullout strength and failure mechanism of posterior instrumentation in normal and osteopenic thoracic vertebrae: Laboratory investigation
【24h】

Evaluation of pullout strength and failure mechanism of posterior instrumentation in normal and osteopenic thoracic vertebrae: Laboratory investigation

机译:正常和骨质疏松性胸椎后路器械拔出强度和失败机制的评估:实验室检查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Object. There is limited data on the pullout strength of spinal fixation devices in the thoracic spine among individuals with different bone quality. An in vitro biomechanical study on the thoracic spine was performed to compare the pullout strength and the mechanism of failure of 4 posterior fixation thoracic constructs in relation to bone mineral density (BMD). Methods. A total of 80 vertebrae from 11 fresh-frozen thoracic spines (T2-12) were used. Based on the results from peripheral quantitative CT, specimens were divided into 2 groups (normal and osteopenic) according to their BMD. They were then randomly assigned to 1 of 4 different instrumentation systems (sublaminar wires, pedicle screws, lamina claw hooks, or pedicle screws with wires). The construct was completed with 2 titanium rods and 2 transverse connectors, creating a stable frame. The pullout force to failure perpendicular to the rods as well as the pattern of fixation failure was recorded. Results. Mean pullout force in the osteopenic Group A (36 vertebrae) was 473.2 ± 179.2 N and in the normal BMD Group B (44 vertebrae) was 1414.5 ± 554.8 N. In Group A, no significant difference in pullout strength was encountered among the different implants (p = 0.96). In Group B, the hook system failed because of dislocation with significantly less force than the other 3 constructs (931.9 ± 345.1 N vs an average of 1538.6 ± 532.7 N; p = 0.02). In the osteopenic group, larger screws demonstrated greater resistance to pullout (p = 0.011). The most common failure mechanism in both groups was through pedicle base fracture. Conclusions. Bone quality is an important factor that influences stability of posterior thoracic implants. Fixation strength in the osteopenic group was one-fourth of the value measured in vertebrae with good bone quality, irrespective of the instrumentation used. However, in normal bone quality vertebrae, the lamina hook claw system dislocated with significantly less force when compared with other spinal implants. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of different transpedicular screw designs on the pullout strength in normal and osteopenic thoracic spines.
机译:目的。在具有不同骨质的个体中,关于胸椎中脊柱固定装置的拉出强度的数据有限。进行了对胸椎的体外生物力学研究,以比较4种后固定胸椎结构相对于骨矿物质密度(BMD)的拉出强度和破坏机理。方法。共使用了11个新鲜冷冻的胸椎(T2-12)中的80个椎骨。根据周围定量CT的结果,根据BMD将标本分为两组(正常组和骨质疏松组)。然后将它们随机分配给4种不同的仪器系统中的1种(椎板下金属丝,椎弓根螺钉,椎板羊角钩或带导线的椎弓根螺钉)。该结构由2个钛棒和2个横向连接器完成,形成了稳定的框架。记录到垂直于杆的破坏力以及固定破坏的模式。结果。骨质疏松症A组(36根椎骨)的平均拔出力为473.2±179.2 N,正常BMD B组(44根椎骨)的平均拔出力为1414.5±554.8N。 (p = 0.96)。在B组中,钩系统由于位错而比其他3个结构要小得多(931.9±345.1 N,而平均值为1538.6±532.7 N; p = 0.02),因此失效。在骨质疏松症组中,较大的螺钉显示出更大的抗拔出力(p = 0.011)。两组中最常见的失败机制是通过椎弓根基骨折。结论。骨质量是影响后胸植入物稳定性的重要因素。骨质疏松症组的固定强度是在具有良好骨质量的椎骨中测量的值的四分之一,而与所使用的仪器无关。但是,在正常骨质椎骨中,与其他脊柱植入物相比,椎板钩爪系统脱位的力明显较小。需要进一步的研究来研究不同的椎弓根螺钉设计对正常和骨质疏松性胸椎棘突强度的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号